this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Operating Systems

3910 readers
1 users here now

All things operating system related, from Windows to Mac to Linux distros and the more obscure.

Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm currently on Win11 but I'm getting that familiar Linux itch and want to dual boot a while again. I tend to gravitate towards Ubuntu simply because it's so big and well supported by most things.

I've run Arch in the past but I've gotten too old and lazy for that if I'd be completely honest. I have played with manjaro and endeavour though.. and opensuse tumbleweed, rolling is kind of nice.

Not sure what I'd try out first this time so I figured I'd get some inspiration from you guys!

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] winged_fluffy@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm currently on Pop! OS 22.04 LTS. For me it worked out of the box. That installer with the NVidia drivers already included was a dream, so I didn't have to set up anything special. I did end up preferring the KDE desktop over Gnome, so I just went screw it and installed KDE plasma on top of it. It's been my daily driver like this for years.

Though, honesty requires me to mention that over the 4-ish years I've been using it they pushed a kernel update twice which killed the nvidia drivers, causing you to be unable to boot to the desktop. Solution was as simple as just rebooting into the previous kernel for a while and waiting for an update which fixes it, but still...

Other than that, pretty happy with it and I'm unlikely to change anytime soon.

[–] ezri@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I tried PopOS but had several issues immediately, including the display flickering despite updating my Nvidia driver. Other than that it just felt like a somewhat worse Ubuntu to me, so I quickly went back to Ubuntu

[–] nlm@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

One thing that bugged me last time I wanted to try out Pop was that my Efi partition was considered too small. It was 500mb, you'd think that'd be enough?

[–] regulatorg@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

PopOS is best for out the box gaming, its similar to Ubuntu so you'll be familiar with it

[–] nlm@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's their biggest advantages against Ubuntu?

[–] averyfalken@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Truthfully it comes with nvidoa drivers pre installed.

Personally I run mint and its just a couple of clicks to get it installed in mint. I tried pop is didn't like it that much and gave me less stability with some of my use cases

[–] nlm@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's basically what I figured. Plus some bells and whistles in the design department. Might just as well go with *buntu and install drivers then.

[–] averyfalken@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

Don't know how different it is with buntu I know mint does extra things. I'd you like the cinnamon desktop mints the best bet

[–] simonced@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In my case, I use Fedora exclusively (no dual boot).

I tried PopOS, but I had problems with each update.

[–] nlm@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Any particular reason for Fedora or is that just what you are comfortable with?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kaldo@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I really should have known better than to expect a consensus in a topic like this 😁 Ask 10 linuxheads which disto is the best and you'll get 12 different answers

[–] nlm@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Well that's what's fun though isn't it? :D

I ended up installing Kubuntu 20.04 for now.. I was going to install Pop but they require a 1GB EFI partition and I didn't have the patience to move my Windows partition around to resize it so.. Kubuntu it is.

Knowing myself I'll probably distro hop in a few days again.

Trying out different distros are almost as much fun as actually using them (probably more fun at times!)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Im really surprised that I don't see zorin os on these types of threads. Its main stick is to be chock full of out of the box software especially around windows compatibility. wine and play on linux are ready right away and I can run most windows programs right after install.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] soulsource@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm running Gentoo on my gaming PC, and would not want anything else.

It's very customizable, as it allows to tweak packages' optional dependencies at compile time. It's also rolling release, so no stress with distribution upgrades. Despite that, it's also very stable (most of the time...).

So far the only downside I've seen is that updates can take a while, as almost all packages get compiled from source.

[–] nlm@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Gentoo is.. well I wouldn't exactly call it nice, but neat? :)

I've played around with it a bunch but grew impatient with it. The compile times was terrible for me back then.

Gentoo and Arch do have their niche though. Takes a bit longer to set up but they're quite customized to your liking when you're done.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TheNH813@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I use Void Linux. I like how much more up to date the libraries and apllications tend to be, it's quite similar to Arch in that regard, as it's a true rolling release just like Arch.

It also tends to be very stable as well, with couple minor issues I had ever experienced got fixes within 48-ish hours. One was hugin not launching, and the other a transition issue between pipewire-media-session and wireplumber being the default.

Void uses runit for service management, and is still multithreaded despite taking a more similar approach to just plain shell scripts, and constantly monitors services. What I like about this is more much simpler services are to write compared to SystemD, and then you just put a simlink to them from /etc/sv/ to /etc/runit/runsvdir/default/ to enable or disable.

Void also uses their own XBPS package system, which operates similar to pacman, and is equally fast. Void is basically a rolling release like Arch, with the latest updates, but instead has a more "classic" system management style, which I for one greatly appreciate.

After nearly a decade of distro hopping, Void is where I landed for at least the past several years, and I see no reason to leave. Just sharing incase someone else out there thinks this sounds like the system for them, and if so, Take a Step Into the Void, it might be what you're looking for. That's what I like about there being so many distros, there's choice to match each one's needs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hallettj@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

I've been evaluating NixOS to make sure I can run games on it. I've only tried a machine with Intel graphics so far, but I see that AMD and Nvidia drivers are packaged. It seems convenient now that I've figured out the setup.

Vulkan is set up out of the box.

It's necessary to enable 32-bit DRI support by adding this line to /etc/nix/configuration.nix:

hardware.opengl.driSupport32Bit = true;

To use Lutris install the package and use its UI to install runners. I didn't have to configure any extra libraries to get Battle.net running. You can configure the "system wine" that Lutris sees, and extra libraries your games might need like this:

home.packages = with pkgs; [
  (lutris.override {
    extraLibraries =  pkgs: [
      # List library dependencies here
    ];
    extraPkgs = pkgs: [
      wine-staging
    ];
  })
];

Those lines go in a Home Manager config file, like ~/.config/home-manager/home.nix. That installs Lutris, and any listed dependencies at the same time.

NixOS does not put dependencies in the file paths where programs usually look for them. That traditional directory structure is called the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, or FHS. But Nix packages can create a virtual FHS where needed, and that is what the Lutris package does. That lets software that isn't built for Nix work, like Lutris' Wine runners. That means that for games to access libraries those libraries must be listed in that extraLibraries option so that they are included in the FHS.

32-bit libraries are in pkgs.pkgsi686Linux.* if you need them.

I haven't tried Steam yet, but I think it has an option similar to the extraLibraries one for Lutris.

A nice feature of NixOS is that if you add a bunch of libraries to your config trying to get a game to work, those libraries are automatically unlinked when you remove them from your config so your system stays nice and tidy.

[–] Chobbes@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’ve been having a great time with games on NixOS. Steam just works when you enable it. I believe you can specify extra libraries for the filesystem hierarchy hackery, but I haven’t needed to yet. One thing you should know about (if you don’t already) is steam-run which is a simple command line tool that automatically wraps things in a normal FHS. Super convenient for the occasional binary :).

[–] hallettj@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good to know, thanks! Do you find steam-run to be helpful even for non-steam binaries that need an FHS? Or do you use it mainly for games?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thegreenguy@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

NixOS. If you played around with Arch you'll be fine. My only gripe (although it's kind of important) is NVIDIA doesn't work. Call me lazy but I haven't felt like switching to an other distro, plus I'm not much of a hardcore gamer.

[–] Bucket_of_Truth@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's a huuuuuge problem seeing that Nvidia has like an 80% gpu market share.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›