124

More "for the children" invasive bullshit. Less privacy and more government intrusion is not what voters want out of bipartisanship.

I'm somewhat heartened by what happened with SOPA, but the ongoing attempts to remove constitutional protections "because it's the internet" are not a sign that things are going in the right direction.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 1 year ago

Why are geriatric patients who can't open a pdf trying to make laws about the internet?

[-] PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago

They can open a pdf, or their Legislative Assistants can. That stuff is performative, making sure we don’t expect them to regulate huge corporations because they’re so incompetent. This is the stuff they’re interested in regulating, so they do.

[-] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Many american states are right now making laws to persecute LGBT people and women who have abortions, and anyone believes associating personal ID to every post is a good idea?

The kind of stuff people try to push in name of "protecting the children" is wild.

[-] garrett@infosec.pub 12 points 1 year ago

Drives me nuts that people do this garbage “for the kids” while doing nothing to support the groups working to stop actual child abuse. Go support NCMEC or something instead of being worried a child might Google “gay”.

[-] Jediotty@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

That's cuz it's not for the kids, any time they want to shoehorn in some stupid bill, it's always "for the kids" or "for national security", so when people rightfully oppose a massive invasion of privacy, they can say "They hate the kids look!".

It's a lot easier to defend "Protecting children" than it is to defend what they're actually wanting to do. If this actually goes through, I honestly probably would just drop off posting things online. I've been off Twitter and Facebook for a long time, I left reddit over the 3rd party apps, honestly I just don't care anymore, I will oppose this 100%, but if it gets passed, I guess I'm just done posting lol

[-] garrett@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

Having had to work in removing CSAM from a hosting provider, it just feels extra insulting when idiots say things are “for the kids”. Between that, and the likelihood of all these companies holding your driver license and subsequently leaking it online in a hack, I just can’t wrap my head around it on any level.

That said, I suspect it’s untenable to apply this to smaller orgs like the fediverse anyway so I don’t see the rubber hitting the road over here.

[-] Jediotty@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I agree with you on that, either way shits fucked, hopefully they don't fuck it up more

[-] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Many american states are right now making laws to persecute LGBT people and women who have abortions, and anyone believes associating personal ID to every post is a good idea?

The kind of stuff people try to push in name of "protecting the children" is wild.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
78 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS