628
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dnoods@vlemmy.net 10 points 1 year ago

This might be an over simplified approach to a complex problem, but why can’t we just eliminate political parties altogether? I know people will always form groups/organizations/fraternities/etc, but only giving them two (realistic) options just forces them into camps that they might not fully agree with. Sure, you can argue that there are plenty of independent parties to choose from, but when it comes election time, it’s always either “Option A”, “Option B” or your vote doesn’t matter. At the very least, remove the two party system and any other systems that reenforces them.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Nebraksa tried that. Made it illegal to display political party names or endorsements on state elections.

Also had a constitutional amendment to the state constitution that if a politician voted against term limits, the phrase "this candidate voted against term limits" would be printed below their name on ballots.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I wish democrats would make moving to places like Montana, the Dakotas and Wyoming a priority

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] kava@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It makes me sad that leftists are leaving Florida. They are turning a purple state into a red one. Every sane person that leaves Florida means the ratio gets tilted more and more into the looneys.

People need to stay in red states. Voting blue in Colorado isn't going to do anything

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Blue states don't give an egg.

Red states "where you from, and why are you here? Don't take my water".

At least that was last time I visited the Midwest in my own vehicle (but they can't spot rentals very well, treated me like their kin when I didn't have California plates and hid my accent as much as possible)

[-] _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

What Midwestern state was that? A lot of folks don't realize that, outside of big cities and their respective suburbs, most of the Midwest is indistinguishable from the deep south.

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

The failure of Reconstruction haunts us.

[-] lowsnr@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

This has been going on since the 1960's. The Big Sort is a really interesting read explaining some of the trends and why it's accelerating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] demvoter@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Eh, they are becoming so extreme that they are leaving some of their voters behind. They were supposed to win the house in a landslide and they barely hung on. They are losing special elections because their candidates are too extreme. Even the Supreme Court can’t stomach some of their gerrymandering on race. I don’t buy this.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
628 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2204 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS