1084
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Oil is used for more than just energy.

[-] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago

70% of crude oil ends up gasoline and diesel.

[-] frank@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

Idk why you're being downvoted. Petrochemicals are used for a bunch of stuff, including plastics manufacturing.

We should switch to renewables as quickly and completely as we can, but it wouldn't eliminate 100% of oil use

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

I argue that if oil wasn't as cheap, ecological alternatives to plastic would have a chance or would be considered at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

No, they wouldn't. Capitalism is driven by supply, not demand.
If by some magic we switched to renewables over night, the owner class would open or expand another market to keep those ships moving.

[-] philpo@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that worked totally well for the Guano and sodium nitrate businesses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago
[-] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

Yo, you right

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

I'll allow it.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

As nice as it would be, a not insignificant amount of coal being transported is destined to steel production. Steel is iron + carbon, and the easiest source of carbon is coal. Steel is pretty important, so that's not going away anytime soon. I wonder if carbon capture could make a product that could be used to replace coal here though, and fairly effectively sequester the carbon in an actually useful form?

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

What biomass grows the fastest without being waterlogged - I imagine bamboo or sugarcane or something

Grow that, and burn it to make carbon neutral steel; bonus points if you do it in a highrise/underground farm but frankly some medium term reversible environmental damage is preferable to killing off way more with climate change

[-] Phineaz@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Eh, purity is a thing. Biomass is the opposite of what you want there, but it could be doable. I do wager, however, that the largest "climate cost" of steel comes from the repeated melting of the steel.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Coal has a bunch of impurities compared to charcoal I thought?

And if the repeated melting is done by burning biomass/charcoal or with clean(er) energy then it's not a huge issue

[-] JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Electric Arc Furnaces are probably our best bet for that - they're an established, proven technology and can be swapped over to a green power source without any other changes (assuming the society has the energy capacity). I think I remember reading that a factory somewhere in Europe had already done that but a quick search has failed me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Comment105@lemm.ee -4 points 1 day ago

I don't know about all of you, but I know I wouldn't want to cross oceans without a good engine.

Storms are not cool. Not being in the age of sail anymore seems good.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You say that, but modern sail concepts are a thing and are already in place as hybrid shipping solutions. Boats require a LOT of energy to do their thing, so any savings translates to big numbers.

https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/new-wind-powered-cargo-ship-sets-sail-2023-08-22_en

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, I'm only bothered by the notion that we should ask sailors to start faffing with sails again. It was harder and more dangerous. It's a good addition, but relying on it seems not worth it when we've gotten past it.

I've personally raised sails at sea, it's not that hard. But going up into the mast, especially when the weather starts getting serious, is not something sailors should have to do again if they they don't have to. It's practically more suitable as an extreme sport. Human lives were just worth less back then.

But having them as efficiency assists, maybe even just sailing with the engine as a backup, that would be great.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago
[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

High schooler post

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Let’s fucking go!!!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
1084 points (97.3% liked)

solarpunk memes

2707 readers
250 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS