dejected_warp_core

joined 2 years ago
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

That makes sense. The specific heat of water is a real bastard to overcome.

Ah, you're describing Moral licensing, and that's entirely plausible.

In this case it's "Littering is bad, but there's no trash cans here and I'm a generally good person so, just this once."

Except I suspect that "once" is really "every so often."

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Agreed. It's at this point I just hand the players the sheet-music for Yakkity Sax.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I won't assert that things are the same as they were decades ago, but in my experience, the teachers/staff are complicit. Either actively or passively (usually passively).

It is my sincere hope that school faculty is (generally) more proactive in involving parents when bullying is apparent. Something tells me that's not the case though. And I can't even fathom what hell social media brings to the table; it must be like Lord of the Flies on there. I recall classrooms and busses when parents/drivers/subs/chaperones weren't present and it was bad.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

I haven't even seen the show and that "Homelander is not the good-guy" is literally all I know about it!

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Another lemming pointed out a hypothesis that explains all this:

To some, good and evil are something you inherently are, not just something you do.

Barring some very, very specific circumstances (e.g. baptism), the die is cast. From that vantage point, it's easy to have shorthand for good/bad guys, regardless of what deeds they commit. This is where corrupt leadership and propaganda slot-in by inventing new and exciting ways to judge people.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Shatire.

You just know that was tossed around Colbert's writer's room, before they decided that might wind up with them off the air sooner.

NGL, as a DM, multiple players with backstabbing abilities are a big problem to overcome. The odds begin to stack up in favor of the party. You start looking for monsters with the awareness of a beholder, but just a tad less lethal.

Then the mage starts hurling fireballs to remind you that you also need more fireproof options.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree. And it goes the other way too. All the posturing by ICE and the AI-generated ragebait from the whitehouse, all just screams "what would I hate." They're making really bad moves, unable to understand how others think, feel, or make decisions. We could double-reverse-uno this situation and ask ourselves "what would they think we think?" It could change everything.

and a lot less afraid of engaging with people we’ve been taught to fear and hate.

I think we're all in more trouble with that than we may realize.

I encountered an instigator on Saturday. I found myself catapulted into a cyclone of rage all because of what he chose to wear: all pro-trump gear. Not because of what he was doing, which was next to nothing, nor what he was saying which was honestly not all that rage-inducing. I couldn't think, I couldn't engage creatively, I couldn't demonstrate effectively, my empathy went right out the window. I just stood there, fuming and stun-locked. And that was one guy. It's not like me, and I didn't used to be like this.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ixion had me at the trailer. Not many games or movies hold that kind of sway over me, and I was so richly rewarded for giving it a shot.

My only frustration with the game is how low replay-ability is, and how the overall plot is fixed. You can make some different decisions along the way, but you're not going to impact the story all that much.

Thank you for posting this. I'll have to check this out - I slept on this for all this time. You don't see many scenario-style games... ever? The fixed timer and resources sound like quite the challenge.

Thanks. I was gonna say that this look is very 1992.

 

I used to really enjoy sites like this. I know there's joke accounts on Twitter and other sites here and there, but I haven't seen anything lately that has the whole site as one big running gag.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q%26A_comedy_website

A Q&A website is a website where the site creators use the images of pop culture icons, historical figures, fictional characters, or even inanimate objects or abstract concepts to answer input from the site's visitors, usually in question/answer format. This format of website, most popular in the early 2000s, evolved from the much older Internet Oracle. The original progenitor of this type of site was the now-defunct Forum 2000. The Forum 2000 claimed to have run the site by means of artificial intelligence, and the personalities on the website were called SOMADs, or "State Of Mind Adjointness pairs". However, later Q&A sites usually dispensed with this pretense, with the most extreme example being Jerk Squad!, on which the administrators of the site provide many of the answers.

 

FTA:

Two Democratic legislators are introducing a bill on Wednesday aimed at Mr. Musk and the so-called Buffalo Billion project, in which the state spent $959 million to build and equip a plant that Mr. Musk’s company leases for $1 a year to operate a solar panel and auto component factory.

The bill would require an audit of the state subsidy deal to “identify waste, fraud and abuse committed by private parties to the contract.” It would determine whether the company, Tesla, was meeting job creation targets, making promised investments, paying enough rent and honoring job training commitments.

If Tesla was found to be not in compliance, the state could claw back state benefits, impose penalties or terminate contracts.

view more: next ›