110
Blizzard releases a $132 mount for WoW (worldofwarcraft.blizzard.com)
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

representing World of Warcraft’s expansions

adds a $90 pay to win mount that gives you half the functionality of an entire major city.

Blizzard milking the whales while delivering a reskin of a mount? Very on brand and representative.

Was saying $90 USD. Did they also do individual gatcha pricing or just regonal?

[-] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 3 weeks ago

This would be a good time to remember that horse armor that caused a shit storm for fishing like 5$ or something. Good times.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago

AFAIK this is different from the original auction house mount. That one had a auctioneer and a vendor who could repair things. This one comes with an auctioneer and a "mailbox" NPC.

For some people whose purpose in playing WoW is to make money trading, this makes it marginally easier. Instead of having to park your mount next to a mailbox, you can both post your auctions and collect your money on one mount. But, since most people doing auction stuff also need access to a bank, it doesn't mean they can easily just abandon the city and live out in the country.

Many of the people who might consider this mount are already playing for free because they make enough money in-game to buy a token every month.

Also, it's $132 if you're Canadian, otherwise it's 90 USD.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Looks like we have upgraded to macrotransactions!

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Other than being one giant wasted potential in general, this is reminiscent of ESO. That game was packed full of expensive mounts (among a million other things) that didn't fit in with the lore of the Second Era whatsoever, though fans of the game will certainly argue that the lore has been so muddied by Zenimax at this point that maybe the Second Era really was packed full of superheroes with glowing eyes, dragon wings and mechanical unicorns.

Prices were also designed so that no matter how many crowns you purchased, you always had some bullshit amount left over that couldn't buy anything of real value, driving you to purchase even more crowns so that your leftovers aren't wasted. I don't think any of them were this expensive, but definitely just as frivolous.

[-] Renacles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The ESO lore is so muddled that Beyond Skyrim is not even considering it canon in most cases anymore, there are just too many contradictions.

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

It irks me greatly that it takes place ~2,000 years before the main series, but architecturally and technologically they appear to be on par or perhaps even ahead of the 3rd/4th eras. The entire game just feels like a giant fan-fiction blunder. There is a near zero risk of death in the overworld due to an obnoxiously low difficulty, and the class system being bound to stupid themes like Templars and Dragonknights rather than just using the original skill/magic trees is one of the worst parts of the game to me. Base classes could have easily been signs of the Warrior, Mage and Thief, and then specialized to your hearts content from there.

[-] Renacles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think it's roughly 700 before Morrowind and almost 1000 before Skyrim but I agree.

Vvardenfell even has Seyda Neen, an imperial colony from an empire that hasn't even reached that place yet, just for the fan service.

The whole game just feels like a good MMO that was forced to be part of Elder Scrolls rather than an Elder Scrolls game that happens to be an MMO if that makes any sense.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Did Chris Roberts get a job there?

If it was Chris Roberts, it'd just be a JPEG of a dinosaur and a promise that the mount is in the pipeline for early pre-production to be added to the next major quarterly alpha release once it's ready.

Also it'd be $499.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Who's Chris Robert?

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Just buy a loot card from the TCG and get a cooler mount

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Just play WoW on a private server and stop supporting Blizzard's anti-user business model.

[-] Nima@leminal.space 3 points 3 weeks ago

this is absolutely the way. the communities are usually a bit more friendly as well on private servers.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

If you’re still paying to play wow you’re the sucker.

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

As I understand it, you can pay your subscription in in-game currency (gold) so this sounds about right to me

I probably would love this shit if I stilled played, 13 years ago I was averaging 12k gold a day and financing a ton of my guild's raiding costs. Was lots of fun, though I'm sure it didn't look like that if you were watching me. Having a mount with AH and mailbox built in would be so OP. But there is absolutely no way I would pay american dollars for any of this garbage

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I had as much fun on the auction house as I did with the rest of the game.

[-] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

You’d have to be a real tool to buy that

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

If we allow this to continue, there will be nothing else.

Only legislation will fix this.

[-] fern@lemmy.autism.place 1 points 3 weeks ago

Rivals of Aether 2 announced there will be no paid DLC because it will be all free. Legislation is needed but there are still, few, good devs out there thankfully.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm just gonna copy and paste my comment from the other big thread about this but I want to ask: why are you lying with the post title? It's $90, not $132.

TLDR: this is obtainable through in-game currency for significantly less than the price of the original brutosaur mount. Most long time players can afford it and I'd imagine most people who bought it did so this way.

Ok so I cackled when I saw the price on this thing but the more I thought about it, the less shitty it is. FWIW I am not a WoW lifer or Blizzard apologist. I got talked into Classic for a year then played a month or two of each expansion since before quitting but I know the background of the story. It looks way worse from an outsider perspective.

You could buy the original auction house mount for 5 million gold back in the day. It stopped being available regularly and now it’s available occasionally in the “black market auction house” and it always sells for the maximum bid.

To combat Chinese gold farmers, Blizzard started selling gold in a bit of a roundabout way. For $20, you can buy a WoW token to sell on the auction house. This token can be purchased by a player and traded for 1 month of game time. Some players dont pay a dime to play - gold is not hard to acquire.

When this new mount came out, WoW tokens were worth about 200k gold. You’d need to exchange them for 5 tokens to get this mount. 1/5 of the original price.

Now tokens are worth 330k. 1.65m gold. STILL significantly cheaper than it was originally.

Tokens will need to rise to triple in price to match the original cost which will still be a tiny fraction of what it cost a month ago.

By far the shittiest thing about this - and I think the only real reason to complain - is that the rising value of the token hurts players who pay for the subscription purely with gold as it adds a few hours to their “working” time in game. For context, watching TV and semi-afk farming will get you like 50k/hour. You can earn way, way more if you’ve leveled up a profession.

The other (not so bad) thing I don’t like about it is that…I hate those mounts. They’re HUGE and people just AFK on them blocking NPCs I want to talk to.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's $132, it's only 90 if you pay in USD.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's 90, it's only 132 if you're Canadian... ( US company)

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, but I assume the poster was Canadian, so it's $132, not 90 USD.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

who the fuck is still playing this microsoft/activision/blizzard game in 2024?

[-] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Not you apparently

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
110 points (94.4% liked)

Games

16741 readers
601 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS