253
submitted 18 hours ago by fukhueson@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 10 points 6 hours ago

If the US is not a third-world country, then why do they do so many third-world country things?

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 73 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

How is it that a third world country Ike mine pays overtime pay to all employees who work beyond the standard 8 hour work day. 25% of the hourly rate is added to the hours of overtime, plus a night differential rate if you work past 11 pm. +30% if you have to do work during a holiday.

Not being paid for overtime work is very slavery to me.

The reasoning of the judge is because the companies will have to pay billions in OT pay. Fuck them.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

We do get overtime pay, this rule was for a very specific segment of workers who were exempt. Being salaried and making under a certain amount. Hourly employees get time and a half for every hour past 40 in a week, federally.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 5 hours ago

The salaried exception floor hasn't been raised in forever, it needs to go way up.

[-] slingstone@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago

What country? Do you offer political asylum to people fleeing dictatorial regimes?

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

Well we currently have the son of the former dictator as a president so there's that.

[-] slingstone@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Does he seem like he's going to do better than his dad?

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 11 hours ago

Sounds like the Philippines.

[-] slingstone@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I assumed it was, but since the poster didn't mention it, I figured they might have their reasons to be vague.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 11 points 15 hours ago

How? Your government is probably not as captured.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 43 points 16 hours ago

B-b-b-but Democrats aren't aligned with the working class!

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 16 points 16 hours ago

I mean this would only have applied to salaried employees earning $20/hr or less which I can't even imagine what type of field that covers since most hourly jobs earn more than that these days.

This is akin to the "pardoning marijuana possession convictions" thing where it didn't apply to a single person in federal custody and only benefitted 3,000 people (with past convictions) in the entire nation.

This is basically virtue signaling and/or table scraps for us peasants.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

And a judge even blocked that. What do we think would happen to more substantial changes?

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 11 hours ago

We'll probably never know because it would require them to actually make a substantial change first.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

But you don't actually know how many people this would have applied to... you just assume, right?

Edit: It's right in the article: "The rule would have extended to approximately four million American workers, guaranteeing them overtime pay."

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

In January, it was going to jump to a minimum salary of 59k to be exempt.

[-] RedSeries@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

If only this logic actually applied. Maybe they wouldn't make anti-trans laws in that shithole state?

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 15 hours ago

Not sure why you would expect the federal government to be able to do anything with state charges.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 56 points 18 hours ago

I hope everyone joined whatever gains unions had the last four years

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago

Obviously a little late for this administration, but could the next liberal admin try beating them to the punch on this? Are there no liberal friendly judicial districts? Have one of those file a weak lawsuit to uphold the law. Then that could at least be referenced when they attack in a red area.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

The problem is SCOTUS. Anything reaching them is going to come down on the Republican side.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago

The problem is there aren't enough actual liberals left in the DNC. The majority of the DNC is more than happy to screw over workers to the benefit of corporations. What resistance they provide is mostly performative, as their real priorities are dictated by what the large corporate donors are paying for.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Screwing over workers to the benefit of Corporations is what Liberals are for. You mean there's no leftist left in the DNC.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

No, the problem is there are too many liberals in the party and not enough leftists. Liberals love them some anti-worker pro-corporate welfare and other right-wing policies that only benefit the rich.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 11 points 16 hours ago

You're assuming there will be elections again

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 11 points 16 hours ago

it's going back to trump's threshold too. if you were enjoying OT with a 37K salary, congratulations, you're exempt now

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 10 points 15 hours ago

Imagine being a salaried employee and only earning $16.80 per hour, assuming 40 hours a week. I wonder what type of work this even covers as that's slightly above minimum wage here, and it requires you to work all those extra hours for free.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago

about the whole "a work week is 40 hours" thing too...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 17 points 18 hours ago
[-] KaRunChiy@fedia.io 9 points 17 hours ago

It's always texas, it's never not texas, is texas just trying to become mississipi? Because it's very quickly headed there.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 11 hours ago

I wish we could just kick Texas out at this point.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 13 points 15 hours ago

People file their cases in this district specifically because it has a bunch of conservative friendly judges.

[-] Fermion@feddit.nl 4 points 9 hours ago

Florida man and Texas Judge are the dynamic duo we didn't really need.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
253 points (98.1% liked)

News

23301 readers
3522 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS