Wow, I didn't know. He is a scumbag.
slingstone
I'm reminded of how great Jeepers Creepers was until the campy monster reveal as an example of how movies often show too much or design their monsters in a way that stops the build up of that critical tension that is necessary in a great horror film. I've not seen all of Nope, but what I have seen continues to ratchet up the tension because, frankly...what the hell is that thing. Creating something so unfamiliar helps keep things going. It's one of the reasons I haven't seen it--i feel like it would fuck me up something awful.
So you're saying it's a perfectly cromulent word?
I like UHF.
The Untouchables has always been a favorite. The scene where they're riding to confront the mobsters on horses at the Canadian border lifts my mood every time. Yeah, I know it's unhistorical garbage, but that theme, man. As the music swells, my heart soars.
Finally! Sweet oblivion!
I'm sure if this person holds this item high over their head and looks intently up into the hole, the truth will come out and they'll absolutely find out what it's about.
At least it appeared the boss understood the mistake. There might be hope for him or her after all.
Or, and stick with me, here, maybe I'm asking the question in hopes I can discuss it with someone that has already read up on it and find out that way? Maybe I can learn some viewpoints of others in this thread that might illuminate the answer more quickly and succinctly. What is the point of communicating with others if I can't seek information through it?
I was just in Union station for the very first time this last spring, and I thought it was perfectly wonderful as a piece of architecture. I'm no critic of the art of building or anything of the sort, but as a rando first time train traveler, I was actually pretty impressed with it. One thing I particularly enjoyed was a little used bookstore and record shop they had on one of the levels.
Here's what I've often wondered: why, when the Constitution clearly indicates that bearing of arms is in the context of a" well-regulated militia", is it not permissible, under the Constitution, to regulate firearms? Do the second amendment types have any kind of argument about this? It just seems to me that within the context of the amendment itself, it's clearly implied that regulation will be necessary and will exist. Is there something that I'm missing?
I mean, you could probably cauterize a wound on a low setting. Why do I feel like I've seen this in a recent episode?
I sing the most stupid songs with the most obvious lyrics (stuff like "You're a dog!" or "Your name is Mr. Dog!") to my dog all the time with joy. I'm not sure exactly what's wrong with me, but my dog loves me anyway.