this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
868 points (93.5% liked)

Malicious Compliance

21743 readers
2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't have an issue with any of this. Private Business owners can sell their products or services to whoever they want. Don't see what the big deal is. If you don't like it, there's plenty more competition willing to take your money.

[–] dmtalon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (19 children)

I can't imagine owning a business and actively promoting your willing to give up sales because of some random person's beliefs.

I fully understand consumers not shopping at a store that puts up signs you disagree with, you can just go to another one.

Nothing wrong in believing in and supporting the good things. I just think I'd not agitate customers if it were my business.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't have an issue with any of this. Private Business owners can sell their products or services to whoever they want. Don't see what the big deal is. If you don't like it, there's plenty more competition willing to take your money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The more I see news about the United States the less I'm surprised

[–] romaselli@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Put up a No Whites signs in front of your businesses to really make some noise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm out of the loop, what did the SCOTUS do now?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alexmitter@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

European here so it may not be clear to me, but I thought discriminating against religious movements like the church or trump supporters is still illegal. Correct?

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Religions are protected classes under the constitution, political groups are not. Free speech is also protected. The combination of these factors means that weather the shop keeper in OPs photo is breaking the law is entirely dependant on how you interpret the constitution, which is what the supreme court is supposed to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›