I totally forgot Blade is a trilogy

Personally I enjoyed matrix 3 more than 2.

The Star Wars one could also apply to the sequels, keep the proportion but maybe lower by half? Ep. 8 certainly was the least bad.

Is this counting films in trilogies, or the trilogies themselves?

Interesting choice not to include the Hobbit movies! I'd probably go 1>2>3, but all those bars would be appropriately hobbit-sized (sans ent-draught).

Mad max is wrong. While sequels...they are not even in the same space. The first one is good for its simplicity.

This is refreshingly accurate

A lot of sequels aren't as good because the original director and writer (and maybe other staff) aren't involved. The original staff may have had a vision for the one movie, and when it's completed, they're not interested in making another one. So the studio that owns the copyright hands it to some newbies so they can get experience and do a low-budget cash-grab sequel.

I would rank them similar to matrix on chart. Liked the 3rd matrix more than "listed" though.

Bro. Have you seen Fellowship of the Ring? It’s 3 hours of “Hey, could you schedule a meeting so we could nail down our deliverables and figure out a timeline?” And 30 minutes of “good meeting, everyone.”

The Temple of Doom sucked. I'd rather watch Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

All three of the Spider-Man originals were fucking horrific. Absolutely no where near good.