this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
486 points (97.1% liked)

Socialism

6010 readers
23 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Changetheview@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago

It’s fucking disgusting. Little more than a manifestation of greed mixed with sociopathic and narcissistic behavior.

The worst part is that there are people who think these deserve that money. This is all on the backs of actual workers. And from a society that they aren’t paying their fair share of.

Should these three individuals be wealthy? Sure. Should they have ever been allowed to accumulate anywhere near this much personal wealth on the backs of literally millions of other people? Fuck no.

This money should have been forcefully spread around to those workers over the course of decades. And a good chunk back to the society that made it all possible.

Instead, these sycophants hoarded more than they could ever need or even want, while keeping wages far too low and paying very little (effective rate) in taxes.

[–] scrooge101@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The graphic is quite outdated (2019 for top 3) and the situation got much worse. The latest datapoint on the website I could find was from 2021, indicating a wealth of 683 billions of the top 5 US citizens.

[–] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

How the fuck does bill gates still have that much money

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I suppose he must be very frugal with household expenses.

[–] windowsphoneguy@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And he doesn't spend money on MacBooks!

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Especially on those avocado toasts!

[–] Retiring@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

MacBooks on Avocado toast. Sounds lovely.

[–] dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He earns it quicker than he can spend or give it away. Money makes money ain’t a lie bruh.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Please consider referring to the income of billionaires not as earnings.

Earning is based on achievement or merit. Profits are appropriated, claimed, or stolen, but not earned.

[–] dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the semantics of the word “earn” are the least of our worries here mate.

Rather than do that I’d rather go and cut his head off and parade it down 5th avenue.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There may not be such an event in the foreseeable future, or at any rate, not in the next few days or weeks.

However, the request is not based on a worry about semantics, but rather an observation that language influences how people think and feel.

Preferring language such as claim or steal over earn helps emphasize that workers have an interest in eliminating a class who lives by our labor.

Using language as you have done serves to vindicate the class disparity, to erase the class antagonism, and to protect the interests of the owning class.

[–] dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can understand that and will try to use different wording.

In this instance I think claim is fine but I would take issue with steal, as I would expect stealing (theft) would most likely have to be backed up by law as stealing is a criminal offence and so for someone to have done that then they should be tried in a court.

Perhaps, the word “earn” could still be used but we could follow it with “through exploitation” as they generally make these profits by exploiting society and their workforce. You can earn things in non-favourable ways after all, no?

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The law protects private property.

If you defend the law, how would you overcome the wealth accumulation of billionaires through the legal construct of private property?

[–] dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am not defending the law, more pointing out the use of certain words have certain meanings, particularly for media companies to print them would be suicide if they said Bill Gates steals $30B. Whilst we may see that accurate, the current law doesn’t and thus they would be sued and give him more money.

I believe nothing will ever change as the vast majority of people don’t care, are numb to it, or don’t have time to care.

I don’t defend the law and in fact I’ll break the law as much as I can get away with.

I’m apathetic to life really and honestly dying doesn’t seem so bad as this place is a hell hole. And I am lucky enough to work my dream job, have a decent employer (< 10 staff, boss (lead engineer, owner) and works harder than me), average quality of life etc and yet I just can’t go on. Everywhere you look it’s just horrific humans committing horrific acts.

Then you have someone arguing about the semantics of words. Perhaps I’m too cynical now but I don’t see anything changing unless we have a mass revolt and well judging by how laws are changing over protests or how people view protesters I can hardly see a French style revolution happening.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do the meanings of words vary or change based on rhetorical stance, cultural context, or historic period?

Are mainstream media and mainstream practices the precedent you understand as the one to guide your choices toward the objectives you identify as meaningful?

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Neocolonialism of Africa and patenting the COVID vaccine (which has resulted in countless unnecessary deaths and creation of forever-COVID)

[–] HowMany@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And, of course, their taxes are "too high" and need to be reduced.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Don't worry, they'll trickle down out of the goodness of their heart and not hoard it all for themselves. Trust me, bro.

Aaany minute now...

[–] HowMany@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Wait! I think I hear it! Like you said!.......................... oops. nope. sorry, my bad. Turns out that was another forest fire.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Around the same time, crypto will make traditional money worthless. The only wealthy ones will be those who invested early. Trust me.

[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 6 points 2 years ago

More than, even.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Create a delivery cooperative and let Jeff's fortune crumble.

Make Linux gaming a thing and see Bill's fortune decline.

Create competition for the top consumer brands and Warren's money is gone.

These men are rich because the free time fought for with strikes and such is spent watching TV.

[–] Fleur__@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's joever

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago

May i have 50 dollars more this year?

No there is no budget.

Oh OK.