this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
2 points (62.5% liked)

Green Energy

2740 readers
31 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
SteveKLord@slrpnk.net
2
MSAART Thunderstorm Generator, converting CO2 - Alpha prospects introduction (www.youtube.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by sushimi@lemmy.ca to c/energy@slrpnk.net
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Because this community is about green, and mentions 'energy production', i'd like to bring to attention this new tech. It can be retrofitted to combustion engines and reduces emissions drastically. Output has seen to achieve 0% CO2 and 20% O2. (if another community would be better suited, i'm happy to place it there)

From the video: Dec 14, 2023 Global reduction of CO2 emissions is critical for the survival of our planet. This video demonstrates the MSAART Plasmoid Power Thunderstorm Generator which provides the solution.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] johnefrancis@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

looks like pseudoscience bullshit to me.

[–] sushimi@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

i agree it's not done and dusted.

But it's less pseudoscience as the "GEET reactor" which seemingly has some similar principles operating in it. However, that was by a few people who didn't have the physics insight/skills to properly analyze what they'd sometimes seen. This "thunderstorm generator" has some proper engineers in various places working at it.

i googled geet vs thunderstorm and actually came across this post. Not really reassuring :/

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Flagrant disregard for thermodynamics and conservation of mass in this post. The carbon has to go somewhere, and removing it from flue gasses will always be extremely energy intensive

[–] sushimi@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But converting isn't the same as what you're suggesting

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

Converting, on a chemical level, always means either combining or breaking apart atoms into or from molecules. To get O2 from CO2 you need to break off the Carbon atom. It will be left over. Where does it go?