Fediverse

35574 readers

167 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ruud@lemmy.world

TragicNotCute@lemmy.world

Xylinna@lemmy.world

MrCenny@lemmy.world

automodbeta@lemmy.world

woelkchen@lemmy.world

127

If you could improve PeerTube, what would you improve? (lemmy.asudox.dev)

submitted 6 months ago by asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Cross-posted from "If you could improve PeerTube, what would you improve?" by @asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev in !asklemmy@lemmy.world

What keeps you away from PeerTube? What features does PeerTube lack? If you were the developer of PeerTube, how would you improve it?

(page 2) 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Automatic subtitles. I know... Not the easiest functionality to develop but I do miss it from Youtube.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Unskippable one-hour long ads. 👌

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Multiple audio tracks for different languages.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I want the ability to have everything behind a login. I don't want people not signed in watching videos and wasting bandwidth.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 5 months ago

I mean I guess this would be an OK option. Disabled by default. IMHO this is the problem with YouTube lol

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can. You can set a video as "internal only". So only users registered on the server, can watch it.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yes but they won't federate out which defeats the point of peertube.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

True, but I wouldn’t want to have a wallen garden, like Instagram or Twitter, where it forces you to create a user.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 months ago

It would be instance by instance policy. I think there are many cases where an instance should only be available to users behind a login while still federating with its network.

[–] fu@libranet.de 0 points 5 months ago

@Fizz @meldrik in Free Software nothing ever "defeats the point" it just may not fit your particular use case. One of the advantages of Free Software is that it can be used by anyone for any reasons.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ads. If I could press a button and inject 30 second ads into videos that would cover the cost of the server, I'd run an instance today and start mirroring a fuckoad of content from YouTube

[–] Scio@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

The ability to post a video to multiple co-authors' channels.

[–] TammyTobacco@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

I thought about uploading videos, but I could never figure out how.

load more comments