this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
427 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

68495 readers
4101 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A notable mention is https://ubports.com/en/ which is different from postmarketos in a sense that ubports uses old kernels with heavy patches. That means: good support for things, but difficult future.

PostmarketOS uses the newest kernels and tries to integrate their patches into mainline kernel, so that the reliability is maintained with all kernel developers.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Phone functionality is the least of my problems, I need an open source replacement for Android Auto / Apple CarPlay.

Not sure how that would work, you'd either have to emulate it to talk to the infotainment system, or get all the infotainment producers to add an open source layer... Sounds like a nightmare either way.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] commander@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Eventually I'll try one. I feel like it can be like desktop Linux where it take a very many many long years until it starts to chip away at single digit values of market share

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's worse. Linux desktop is only possible because of the relative consistency and openness of x86 PC hardware. Phones are nothing like that. At best we will have retro Linux handhelds with phone functionality.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's x86 socs. You can buy a linux tablet right now.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Yes the HW isn't comparable to a modern phone though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It’s much less effort to have something based on Android open source project though.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's also less interesting.

Using regular Linux means you can do a ton of stuff you currently can't on Android:

  • plug in a USB hub and use it like a desktop - Steam Deck does this
  • run regular desktop/server software - want a portable Minecraft server? Go for it!
  • do things w/ btrfs snapshots so you can restore phone state if you mess something up (e.g. I accidentally uninstalled an app and lost settings)
  • keep getting security updates long past when anyone in their right mind expects to get them

Android is already FOSS, and you can get phones with minimal stuff on top of the FOSS core. That's cool I guess, and I use one such distro (GrapheneOS), but it's still Android at the end of the day. I want something different, but I still want basic phone stuff to work (calls, SMS, MMS, camera, etc).

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the problem is there’s just too much work that needs to be put in these things and people don’t really think about it. Android has at this point almost 2 decades of refining the experience for phones, so it’s a good starting point.

But the most important thing I guess is software. People often neglect how much time and effort is put to refine software to the point it becomes polished and bug free. Android has a mature stack to build apps that is very difficult to replicate.

But to be more clear I didn’t mean just getting a degoogled Android and settle with it. Android could also evolve in other ways that aren’t in Google’s interest, such as allowing you to have a sort of Dex that’s actually a Linux Desktop Environment.

The thing is, I don't really care about Android apps, and honestly supporting them probably adds a bunch of limitations since they have a lot of expectations on the system.

I just want an immutable base system w/ flatpaks, a basic dialer, a robust SMS/MMS app, Firefox, and good enough battery life (15 hours w/ moderate screen on time). Basically, openSUSE Aeon or Fedora Silverblue with phone-specific apps.

I'm happy to help port the various software I want to use, but I need the phone to work as a phone first.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Realistically, I would probably try a google free Android long before I'd try a more pure linux phone

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Ive tried a couple of times, ended up bricking a phone and had to re-do another. Linux phones are hard to get set up (for certain models).

[–] KuroNeko@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Be nice if Linux phones could be like how Samsung phones used to be before they started removing features to directly compete with Apple smartwatch markets. I don't understand how competition=downgrades because they wanna stretch features out to sell more products than how it used to be when both companies were all about being the One Phone That Does it All. I can afford the one gadget, always have and always will, but especially now when everything is so expensive I can only ever afford the Samsung A-Series not their main marketed S line.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can i play minecraft on it though? Ive got a horse ranch that I'd really like to continue

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 week ago

Java is inherently cross platform, and works well on linux. So assuming the phone is powerful enough, you should be good to go even if it's linux.

Definitely worth checking out Minetest/Luanti though, it has promise.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Absolutely! The controls might suck and regular phone features might be iffy, but you could totally run the Java version of Minecraft if you wanted. No guarantees about performance though.

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How do you tame a horse in Minecraft?

I need to know for... Reasons.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PussButton@lemmy.org 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean I've been using /e/os for a while now and it works like a charm!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›