this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
167 points (96.1% liked)

Linux

58078 readers
237 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title is quite self-explanatory, reason I wonder is because every now and then I think to myself "maybe distro X is good, maybe I should try it at some point", but then I think a bit more and realise it kind of doesn't make a difference - the only thing I feel kinda matters is rolling vs non-rolling release patterns.

My guiding principles when choosing distro are that I run arch on my desktop because it's what I'm used to (and AUR is nice to have), and Debian on servers because some people said it's good and I the non-rolling release gives me peace of mind that I don't have to update very often. But I could switch both of these out and I really don't think it would make a difference at all.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I can set everything up from two config files. If I want to set up something on my laptop I got working on my desktop it's just cut and paste.

Guess my distro

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aurorachrysalis@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

I dual boot Fedora KDE and Arch.

I've used Mint before and I've little to no qualms with it, but I wanted to move away from X-11, which has no GUI isolation. Hence the switch to Fedora, which has a smooth Wayland experience and also happens to have SELinux out-of-the-box.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Pop OS. Don't use much of its custom features since I have installed sway on top of it and did some custom edits, was thinking of switching to another distro but they announced COSMIC, which looks very cool. Why not stick with the distro that could have the best experience with it?

[–] anomoly_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I installed Manjaro about six months ago because I'd never tried it. I like it so far and it has yet to get in my way enough to make me want to change.

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

It's Debian. It's well-supported by software and super stable and open.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Arch, moved here from Ubuntu when I realized I have a good idea of what I want installed and have no need for a bunch of things to get bundled into the OS

[–] analoghobbyist@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I'm relatively new to Linux, so I'm testing a few distros via VMs right now. My main desktop runs OpenSUSE Leap with KDE Plasma and I love it so far. I'm also trying Fedora 42 with GNOME, but I'm realizing I don't like GNOME. I'm running Linux Mint Cinnamon on a 2016 MacBook Pro, which is pretty nice too. I also ran Debian stable for a bit. OpenSUSE is my favorite of the ones I've tried.

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Debian stable:

  • Works on all of my devices, none of which are newer than 2019
  • Compatibility with all of the software that I use day to day
  • I like my system set up in a very particular way and the stability makes upkeep simple
  • I was a holdout on older Windows versions before I moved to Linux, so getting new features at all is already exciting
[–] Raptorox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Arch

Found it, love it

[–] dragospirvu75@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I use Trisquel because it is recommended by FSF, is based on Ubuntu and I like Mate environment.

[–] fox@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Arch. I'm addicted to updating packages and Arch helps me stay sane.

[–] Spider89@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I like apt and is great stability for servers and unstable branch for desktops/laptops/Legion GO. (Debian with Xanmod).

[–] robber@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

TuxedoOS because my so-called "Linux-Laptop" turned out to not run mainline Linux very smoothly. But I hate that fact that it's Ubuntu-based.

I'd use Debian, Arch or dabble with Void if I could on my laptop, my servers run Debian or Alma.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ran Ubuntu and Ubuntu server first then switched to desktop fedora and liked it so I switched all my servers to fedora. Tried TrueNas Scale in the past and disliked it except for SMB shares. Also have an unraid server but hate it.

I guess I’m pretty superficial about just liking the base fedora DE. Idk beyond that.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I currently use Bazzite on my old laptop, just wanted to try out immutable distros and I like to stream games from my rig to it sometimes so completely functional steam was a nice addition. Plus learning about flatpaks and app images over installed packages has been interesting.

Then on my servers Debian/Proxmox and usually Ubuntu server in LXCs for more updated APTs then Debian, though I mostly run docker for my web apps rather then native APTs.

I work for a company that has a java program that functions on Linux but is nowhere near the level of support provided for mac/Windows, so I'm the Linux guy for our dept and when a customer is running into issues on a distro I'll spin up a vm on my homelab and see if I can rum through an install and get it functional.

So far the only one I literally couldn't get installed was Slackware lol I even figured out how to get it functional in ChromeOSes Linux subsystem.

[–] meh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

debain, with xfce if i need a desktop. mostly because i started on xubuntu. started learning sysadmin stuff when all i could afford was a potato with salvaged computer components shoved in it. xfce considered that excessively over powered. ended up loving the way i set up my xfce env, and probably wont change it much over the next 20yrs because theres no need. so when cononical got extra gross it was easy to just move to debian and carry on with my life.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›