this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
352 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

69770 readers
4923 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca -2 points 6 days ago

They would have been done by now but they're still figuring how to throttle the batteries from afar so folk'll have to buy new and improved ultra next-level glasses after their current pair "dies".

[–] Imperor@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago (15 children)

This AR obsession is utterly baffling to me. There are so few real applications and the hardware requirements are insane so it's not something that will get widely adapted anyway. Sure in a decade or so it might have matured enough to have shed all these issues, but AR/VR feels like a really out of touch thing to prusue, especially if you look at the garbage ideas they have on how to use it - virtual meetings??

I get movies and games on these, possibly even some recording and porn, but these are not their B2B wet dreams anyway.

[–] LiPoly@lemmynsfw.com 78 points 1 week ago (18 children)

In theory, there’s a Million awesome business applications for it.

Let’s say you’re in construction and your glasses tell you exactly what to build where and how.

You’re a waiter and the glasses tell you which table ordered what, needs attention, etc.

You’re a network engineer and the glasses show you on every port which device is connected.

And don’t even get me started on the military applications.

Of course we’re not there yet. But that’s why they’re so obsessed with it. They want to be the first.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 week ago (3 children)

In the current US political climate, giving everyone glasses with always-on cameras run by big tech companies seems particularly dangerous.

[–] LiPoly@lemmynsfw.com 34 points 1 week ago

I agree. But unfortunately, nobody gives a flying fuck.

[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think for the most part society has gotten used to being on someone’s camera when in public at pretty much all times.

It’s something I used to think about, now I just, don’t.

Everyone has been looking for the next big hardware thing. It looked like it might be foldable phones for a little while but I reckon AR Glasses are the ultimate endgame until they start making bio implants.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I’d really just like some glasses that simulate multiple monitors without needing special software. That’s all I want

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

Yep, and that seems to be the route Apple was going. Screens you can place anywhere in your visual field.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Gotta need some insane resolution for that right? And 1000hz refresh to make things good I guess.

I mean for text editing, coding etc.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yep I've played with virtual monitors in VR space and I don't even like watching movies on them, the loss in resolution and the way the dynamic aspect of it (using a moving screen to simulate a static screen) makes it a shitty solution. Eventually it'll be good enough to watch TV in but I can't imagine doing serious work in it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] osef897@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

overlaying ads on literally everything could be the end goal.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This AR obsession is utterly baffling to me.

  • It's a mobile phone you don't need to hold.

  • It's a mobile phone that never goes in your pocket.

  • It's a mobile phone that is always on and has access to everything you see and hear.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's also a device that can literally put your imagination in front of you in the real world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kayazere@feddit.nl 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sounds like a fucking nightmare, but a wet dream to Big Tech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s a bummer than those sound like bad things simply because corporate abuse is always a forgone conclusion. If your data was truly private and always entirely under your control and ONLY your control, those would be really attractive features.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 49 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Being able to keep a screen in front of the user at all times is the goal. This is one step closer to replacing the eyes Cyberpunk style.

This is why Siri and Apple Intelligence is so important to Apple, getting away an actual keyboard will make this more addicting. They can decide what to show you before you even start thinking about it!

Corporations would love being able to not only know where you are at all times, but now they have the tech to see exactly what you see!

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (12 children)

it’s not that complicated, the goal is to create another hit product that everyone wants like the ipod and iphone.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's a gag in Futurama about ads being displayed in your dreams. If that were possible they'd be doing that, but right now they're settling for just the waking hours.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If only Siri could understand what I say

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

I have turned off any assistant app in any of my devices. It would be easier and a lot of times faster just typing out what I need.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlantPowerPhysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Next courageous Apple creation:

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I’d be interested to hear from the youngest generation (15-20 YO) to hear if they care about this at all.

I’m approaching 50 years old and had been an early adopter most of my adult life. Growing up from the 1980s through 2000s, there was a near-mainstream narrative that we were living in a unique era of emerging technologies. It was exciting and we were anxious for anything new.

It seems to me that nothing is really new and there is nothing exciting, if not interesting, about technology today.

I’ve actually been stripping down the technology from my life as it’s become too distracting to get things done and has prevented personal growth and the formation of memories. For one example, I recently subscribed to a print magazine because I prefer a tangible object that I can associate with in and of itself (and choose to own and collect).

Looking at analog trends like vinyl records and film photography and cassette tapes, it seems like people are at least trying to incorporate tangible objects into a modern lifestyle. Then you have the trend of the dumb phones which indicate people are becoming more aware of the detriments caused by an always connected lifestyle. Thankfully, some car manufacturers are returning buttons to their cars in response to owner feedback about everything being a touch screen.

I mean, I’m not a multi-trillion dollar organization with different departments studying the feasibility of future products but I do wonder if something like AR glasses are already more of our past than our future.

I think there’s a more than reasonable desire for a device to help you through your day - especially in foreign countries. But do you think you want that to be glasses or something else?

Lastly, this reminds me of the prediction from Michio Kaku in Physics of the Future about augmented reality contact lenses. Should we at least accept AR glasses as first step towards contact lenses? Do you think society would accept these 20-40 years in the future?

[–] Khuda@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

i am somewhere around it, and i think the best part about AR glasses is we don't have to buy monitors,

when i used to be 15 couple of years ago i also fantacized about the asthetics of 80's after watching many 80's animation films, there was just something about them ,although i wasn't alive during that period.

i am personally more excited about fdvr, i hope we have it in 25 years, but i don't think we will

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

There are a lot of things at Apple that I, as the paying customer, would rather Cook care more about than AR/VR boondoggles.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Guess what Tim Apple? No one wants them just like no one wanted your stupid headset that I honestly can't even remember what it was called.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Well I do want this, augmented/virtual reality is exactly the kind of shit I dreamt about as a kid during the 90's, and having a huge screen available anywhere I go is pretty fucking cool.

But yeah, I used a VR headset exactly once for like 5 minutes, and there's no way in hell I'd buy one from meta or apple. If Valve releases good XR/AR glasses I might consider it.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It sounds cool in theory, but modern tech companies aren't going to make what you wanted as a kid. Whatever they make will be heavily enshittified.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maki@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago (8 children)

This is just another attempt to capture even more control over our attention - advertising everywhere. Of course Apple wants it

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Khuda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Boringgggg, do another trick apple.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 7112@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Honestly, this is probably the next game changing tech. There are lot of uses for AR. Size, style, and battery life are probably the biggest issues to overcome.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

A reality distortion field that seperates a person from the real world? What could go wrong?

It's about as dystopian as it gets.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

You don't have to strap the internet to someone's face to distort their reality with it, as demonstrated by... Well, gestures broadly

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›