this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
789 points (99.6% liked)

politics

23387 readers
3928 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“like hiring the captain of the Titanic to teach navigation”

I have to refer to this podcast, which is brilliant, and puts the ill-fated journey of Titanic in terms I hadn't heard before. There were so many things that went just the right (wrong) way, and it's pretty clear that up until the point of impact, nobody did anything wrong, considering the conventional wisdom of the time.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They called it unsinkable.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

How do you think the unthinkable?
With an itheberg.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

Everyone’s — many people are saying it. And you look at these icebergs, they’re these little ice cubes floating, and then “global warming” — the lying media — we’ve got all these ice cubes! Unbelievable.

It’s very bad what’s been done to these captains. It used to be, you could drive your boat and if you were a good captain they would go “yes sir” and you were all set. Horrible. They’ve got all these, we have to hire DEI now, and suddenly these ice cubes are a problem for these big beautiful gorgeous boats. Horrible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It was never about antisemitism and always about control. The Trump administration wants to control all the "W's" and how at all levels of education.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She accuses it of admitting students who are contemptuous of America,

OK. So what?

Let's logic out that statement:

  • Educational institution accepts students that are "contemptuous of America" -> When the student graduates are they still "contemptuous"? Did they become moreso? No change? Less? None at all?
  • Educational institution actively seeks to deny students who are "contemptuous of America" -> Did they produce "contempt for America" in their graduates? Same problem.

I wonder what would produce "contempt for America"? Maybe deporting people without due process? Or not recognizing human rights?

Maybe we should agree, then: Harvard shouldn't accept students that hate the Bill of Rights. Reject conservative ideology that suggests that due process shouldn't be followed. Reject conservative ideology that actively seeks to undermine the US Constitution.

Let's get keep those people (conservatives) with "contempt for America" away from places like Harvard 👍

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

You have my thoughts so well organized. Thanks. If only that was the point and could be refuted so easily instead of being pointless doublespeak used to justify garbage decisions.

[–] Binky@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I feel like the thing GOP and conservatives fail to really understand is that those liberals of us don’t hate this country when we protest. We want this country to get better. We see unfairness and we want to fix it. We see corruption and want to eliminate it. We as a country get better if we look at all angles to problems and hear all voices.

GOP just wants to hear only the voice of their Orange God.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think they understand but do not agree. Their vision of making the country better is just different, so much so that liberals are unable understand it IS actually what someone could want. They do want to live in a nationalistic distopia.

[–] Binky@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That kind of thinking sees no progress as a society. I get it. There are people who don’t want anything to change…. But that’s a horribly limited vision.

The 1950s were not better in every way. In fact, the only thing I see that was better was income inequality, and that’s the only thing the GOP is actively trying to not fix.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Exactly, that's why they're called conservatives and not progressives.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

MAGA hates the country unless they’re in power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, no fucking shit.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›