this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
974 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

70249 readers
4285 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Unpopular opinion:

I am a public school teacher and I support public schools, but there have been a lot of issues with our education system for a long time. Talk to any kid with ADHD who had to sit through 12 years, and they are indicative of a larger problem. Our idea of school now is as a place that teaches kids to behave and mostly follow rote instruction. Wouldn't it be so much better if we were teaching kids to be creative thinkers, work well in groups, problem solve, and think critically about the information they're getting? We know that's what school should be, but maybe now we will be forced to go there. Yes, there will be issues like learned helplessness and certain skills being difficult to teach, but it's kind of exciting too.

Though it's also possible that public schools will close and only the wealthy kids will be well-educated... can we not, please?

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

"Though it’s also possible that public schools will close and only the wealthy kids will be well-educated… can we not, please?"

Trump and Republicans would like nothing more than to turn this country into another Russia where your kids have to pay through the nose go abroad to get a decent education.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

only the wealthy kids will be well-educated

You could argue we’re already way too far down this road. Quality of education is very dependent on location. Some of it is rich districts but also richer states. Whatever level of granularity you want, there’s always sone more willing or more able to spend money on better educating their children.

For all its faults, Department of Education was at least trying to set minimum standards for those areas unwilling to invest in a good education system and minimum investments for those unable. We desperately needed to raise this bar, not remove it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't call it unpopular because how the education system works in America and several other countries has been a very obvious problem for decades. What we should be teaching is more barometer question

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barometer_question

The student admitted that he knew the expected “conventional” answer, but was fed up with the professor's "teaching him how to think ... rather than teaching him the structure of the subject.

[–] brognak@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Man, I am 38. When I was in highschool I was in an alternative curriculum Math program called IMP, and it is/was literally what your talking about.

Instead of memorizing equations we were instead given a hypothetical situation and learned to solve it socratically both through conversations as a class with the teacher, and in small groups to try and figure out how to solve it. It made me love math so much I almost made it my life, it was literally everything I needed as a severely ADHD teen. Everything was a puzzle to be solved, and when you solved it you gained not just knowledge, but the perspective to know where the knowledge applies.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] p3n@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is it really screwing up the education system, or is it just revealing how screwed up it already was?

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Came here to say that. If AI has the leeway to affect things in a negative way, then we're not focusing on the right things to begin with. If kids are graded sometimes for the amount of (not necessarily coherent and sound) text they're able to spit out, this is what you get.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The corrupt cheapskates trying to nickel and dime every ISD in the country to bankruptcy absolutely fell over one another at the opportunity to fire staff and replace them with Clippy.

Twenty years ago, state officials were all fawning over the idea of turning every university in the country into a pile subscription based Udemy online courses. Ten years ago, letting Pearson hijack the lesson plan of every classroom in the country was the dream. This has been a long time coming.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Well, here's how you figure that out - think about it with your brain. Should children and young adults be given materials and assignments that require them to use thinking and develop their brains, or should they be given machines to do their thinking for them so that it's easier to complete schoolwork?

One route develops valuable brain skills that can be useful for life, and the other teaches dependency on fancy machines to accomplish the same.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What's breathtaking is how clueless education system administrators are failing at their jobs. They've been screwing up the system for a very long time, and now they have a whole new set of shiny objects to spend your money on.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In my former school district they paid a ton to some consultancy firm to "use AI to optimize the bus route". The first day of testing the new route many kids didn't get home until after 9pm. They cancelled school for the rest of the week and then immediately reverted to the old route.

[–] Epic@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago

lol , piret getting robbed kind of situation we are in

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

We’ve been needing to rework education for years now anyway. At least this will force the teachers to change & adapt, whether they like it or not.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

What teachers?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Eggyhead 150 points 2 days ago (57 children)

NGL, it’s really f*cking depressing when you give students 30m to create something of their own imagination, and they do it in the first minute with chatGPT and spend the other 29m playing games the phone and asking to “go to the bathroom” whenever they notice someone in the hallway.

The excuses you hear when you do something so oppressive as to request they keep their phones in their own backpacks for the duration of the task.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 day ago (18 children)

I regularly advocate for banning phones from schools but people here in Lemmy (same on Reddit years ago) completely lose their shit with that idea, start talking how that'll leave them defenseless in an emergency, how it is torture, how they absolutely can't live without them

Not thirty years ago nobody had cellphones in school, they barely existed, and everything was fine, everyone was fine without and with cellphones I see so much shit going on. Yes, it's the Future, kids need cellphones, but they also need to learn to be without cellphone, and they need to learn responsible use.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ngl. I bought a signal jammer for my wife to use in her classroom (after all, it said “for educational purposes only”) and the kids could never figure out why the signal sucked so bad in her classroom during class times. She never got caught using it and never had to worry about them being on their phones.

If there was an emergency, people would just call the front office and they could always reach her on the land line in the classroom.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Violating federal laws is awesome, everyone should do it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

(after all, it said “for educational purposes only”)

The FCC hates this one simple trick

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (55 replies)
[–] happydoors@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Unfortunately, I think many kids could easily approach AI the same way older generations thought of math, calculators, and the infamous “you won’t have a calculator with you everywhere.” If I was a kid today and I knew I didn’t have to know everything because I could just look it up, instantly; I too would become quite lazy. Even if the AI now can’t do it, they are smart enough to know AI in 10 years will. I’m not saying this is right, but I see how many kids would end up there.

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This could be complete bullshit because im not an expert but i sometimes think that we could have a future where without testing and nurturing peoples critical thinking skills we end up with people who dont know how to create a rational argument or assess information they are given for its accuracy and authenticity, or to know when they are being deceived by malicious actors.

English writing assignments as simple as a book report require you to take different views and angles on something to understand it better and the nuances of the whole, but tell a LLM to write it for you and you are not developing that part of your own mind where you may learn to do things like see the whole story above the individual events noise, see things from others perspective/feelings and understand alternate world views. These are critical for having empathy for others and understanding the world around you.
And that is just one small example i came up with.

[–] gadfly1999@lemm.ee 3 points 22 hours ago

We are already there. Just look at the state of society right now and observe the critical thinking and media literacy skills of the average person.

In the words of cyberpunk author Wiilam Gibson: “The future is already here – it’s just not very evenly distributed.“

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 56 points 1 day ago (26 children)

That's going to be great fun when the AI bubble pops and the subscription prices go up exponentially.

On the other hand, there have been other opinions about education that say it should be about making or researching something. Give a student a goal and let them figure it out using chatbots or whatever.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] astro_ray@piefed.social 107 points 2 days ago (10 children)

TBH, I'd AI can screw up the education system so fast then it is the fault in the education system. AI is bad, but our education system is not good either.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Going to have generations of people unable to think analytically or creatively, and just as bad, entering fields that require a real detailed knowledge of the subject and they don't. Going to see a lot of fuck ups in engineering, medicine, etc because of people faking it.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lmao. I'm guessing you don't work in any of those fields. Got some bad news for ya bud. It's been that way for decades. Probably centuries.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Norin@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I teach at a community college. I see a lot of AI nonsense in my assignments.

So much so that I’m considering blue book exams for the fall.

[–] Gloria@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

For anyone who is also not from the US:

A blue book exam is a type of test administered at many post-secondary schools in the United States. Blue book exams typically include one or more essays or short-answer questions. Sometimes the instructor will provide students with a list of possible essay topics prior to the test itself and will then choose one or let the student choose from two or more topics that appear on the test.

EDIT, as an extra to solve the mystery:

Butler University in Indianapolis was the first to introduce exam blue books, which first appeared in the late 1920s.[1] They were given a blue color because Butler's school colors are blue and white; therefore they were named "blue books".

[–] errer@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Importantly it is hand written, no computers.

Biggest issue is that kids’ handwriting often sucks. That’s not a new problem but it’s a problem with handwritten work.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›