this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
674 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

11798 readers
1591 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As it turns out it doesn't actually cost that much on regular transit, there's an AIRPORT SURCHARGE because it's an "airport train".

No wonder Americans don't use public transit, even when the system exists it's ridiculously difficult and expensive to use.

Source

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shifty@leminal.space 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Imagine working minimum wage in SF and commuting in by BART + BUS / MUNI Lightrail / CALTRAIN / FERRY. Gotta work at least 2 hours just to cover the costs of your commute every day.

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 18 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Wait... Employers don't cover travel cost to and from work in America..?

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Where do they cover your commuting costs? I've never heard of that.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

In Brazil, it's pretty common for the employer to pay your transit fare to/from work. Often you can receive the same value directly instead if you choose to use another form of transportation.

[–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Here in Paris, half of our transportation fee (carte Navigo, 87€ per month) is paid by the employer.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's common in multiple European countries.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Entheon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope, very rarely do you see them cover it at all. That's why we hate our 1+ hour drive commutes.

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wtf? It's normal in the Netherlands...

Public transport will be the whole second class price. By car it is up to 23 cents per kilometer.

[–] Entheon@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Gosh that would be nice. Unfortunately we are stuck on simpler issues like "do kids deserve to eat at school", so it'll probably be a while before we get paid commute time.

[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

No they don’t

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elgordino@fedia.io 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I once went through a BART gate line by mistake, I was trying to get to the trolley service and misread the signage. I immediately exited. The charge: $6.20. Still can’t believe it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Toronto’s UP express checking in. $12.35 from down town to the airport. Sub way in the city is cheap and affordable but that dam airport thing is in its own world.

https://www.upexpress.com/en/about-up/things-are-looking-up

Next topic is toll roads. 407. Full there and back trip during main business hours. 274km = $173.50

[–] dermanus@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

It used to be more. Then someone pointed out it was more expensive than a cab from downtown to the airport.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

Edit the listed fare in the post is nearly 4x the actual fare.

As it turns out it doesn’t actually cost that much on regular transit, there’s an AIRPORT SURCHARGE because it’s an “airport train”.

If she's not going to an airport (the pictured station is in SF and not SFO) this is just strait up wrong. As a regular BART rider who's used transbay service for years BART can't tell what trains you ride. They bill purely on the entry and exit station. I've pulled some transfers that on other systems would be wildly expensive to work around occasional systemwide issues without increased cost.

Within SF it costs the fixed Muni rate which is a lot cheaper. It is disturbingly fast and reliable especially as parts of the system date from the Nixon administration. It can be annoying to get to and from though.

Edit: The furthest fare from Oakland (Coliseum) to the station in the photograph (Montgomery) is 5.20. Using the OAK connector does bring it up to 12.65. Going to SFO from Coliseum is 12.10. Going for some reason airport to airport is 19.55. Not sure where she got $16 from.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] pc486@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (9 children)

FYI, airport surcharges are very common. Across the bay at Oakland has an airport surcharge. Sydney has them too, which I was happy about because Melbourne doesn't have a train (AU $25 for a bus ticket, which was sold out) nor did Hobart. I recall AREX in Incheon also having a significant fare jump for the airport stops.

For argument purposes, BART is $0.18/mile (19th Oakland <> Berryessa). That's still pretty high for regional public transit, which is mostly due to BART's high farebox recovery. That high recovery is now a problem with the whole pandemic and subsequent slow return of ridership.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's still probably significantly cheaper than Uber/Lyft.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

for bart, it charges by the distance, for muni, they recently up thier fees for tickets, they are also have a budget mismangment issue which causes thier budget problems. they waste twice as much as they bring in through fare evasion fees, and transit fees, last i heard they are cutting some services in the summer. and there has some justification for fare evasion(just dont discuss this on reddit, because its mostly been infiltrated by do-gooders conservatives)

caltrain is a seperate agency than, bart, muni.

the mismangment parts: 1 of the problem is they spent twice as much as they are recouping in transit fees, lik 6+ million hiring inspectors over 2-3 million in fees. visit the reddit subs for more info.

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty sure must of us aren't going anywhere near Reddit. Muni seems a mess from my perspective, but when I visit there from sac the $8 or whatever it is for all day transit seems reasonable to me. Might have the price wrong, last time I was there was Chinese New Year and I rode the cable cars all day which was totally worth the $8. But I might as well be a tourist so I don't know just how fucked it all is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i wondered, who is this person who is so out of touch that she thinks that is a reasonable price, and... she is a former member of congress from orange county who is currently campaigning to be governor of california 🤡

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 13 points 1 week ago

JFK rail transfer to Jamaica Queens is like... Shit like 8.50? Then you can get on the 'regular' subway. It's way cheaper (and can take about the same time from Manhattan) than using a taxi or an Uber.

So your airport transportation is 8.50 on top of your metro card (34 a week which easily is covered if you are about the city at all).

WAY cheaper using the subway in NYC than owning a vehicle. A month for the metro is 132 for comparison.

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

In case anyone is wondering, a one way trip from Oakland International Airport to the Civic Center station in San Francisco (the stop next to City Hall and the city's largest open air fent market) is exactly $12.65.

The trip from Oakland to Civic Center is "just" $5.20, but like OP said, there's a fuckass stupid airport surcharge for the last half mile or so.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had to go through SF a few times this year. I have no idea how much the transit cost, but it was fucking expensive and I just rode a few times per day across town or to the airport.

I love public transit systems and being free to move around a city using them. It's a truly liberating experience to have real freedom, but damn SF was tough to understand and weird in places. They've got to unify the system and start paying for it or it's going to just keep crushing their downtown areas when no one uses the transit to visit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The current toll to cross the bay bridge by car from Oakland to sf is $8, and like someone mentioned it's only $4.25 from Oakland to sf without the airport charge, so you are still saving by using bart, just not as much as you probably should.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Bart is expensive, but some of the best transit in America unfortunately. Why I generally just hop the gate by pushing through before the things close

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›