this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
1757 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

12764 readers
1331 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Come to Seoul~~~

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Look at something like the podbike and imagine that as a self driving micro taxi that goes 50 kmh max. Little embedded energy, material and only needs small batteries and incredibly energy efficient because of aerodynamics (slimmer). Energy efficient even compared to trains or busses, especially in areas or times with lower utilization.

If you want to eliminate cars and make mass transit work as energy efficient as possible, you NEED self driving single seater cars (or double seaters with face to face).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I know many don't like this but i'll say my opinion again:

Public transport should be built on the coastlines, which coincidentally also are blue states, because there's a high population density and public transport makes sense there because of the frequency.

Public transport does not and never will make sense in the midwestern and rural areas of US. The major reason for this is that people there simply largely (70% of people) don't want it. You can't get something through against the will of the local population. Just deal with it. You won't be able to take a train from the East Coast to the West Coast, you'll still have to fly (or drive) that distance.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

All this 'public transit not work for the rurals' shit i keep hearing repeated just seems like something you say to make what has happened so far seem somewhat reasonable and just, a statement of hope and denial, not anything supported by history¹, not anything derived from deep analysis of available options and methods², and not anything an expert told you³.

Please stop repeating it without evidence.

¹because it's not. Quite the opposite.

²im not a serious transit nerd and theres shit obvious to me that you people miss every time

³because they wouldn't

there is evidence it doesn't work well in some rural areas of the us, specifically Nome Alaska, which had a railroad (last I checked the rails were still there in significant disrepair) that failed because the company ran out of money

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the issue goes well beyond technical terms, where it would probably be doable.

The issue is of a fundamental nature: The right to self-determination. You cannot make states install public transport that don't want it.

That's just how a society works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club -4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

I want flying cars. Fuck trains. Build nuclear powered flying drone-like cars, what's the fucking problem?

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 1 points 4 weeks ago

What about both? Nuclear powered flying drone-like trains

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›