this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023

49 points (81.8% liked)

SpaceX

2289 readers

23 users here now

A community for discussing SpaceX.

Related space communities:

Memes:

!spaceflightmemes@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works

few@sh.itjust.works

clothes@lemmy.world

burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Canigou@jlai.lu

Starship Takes Flight! (video.twimg.com)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works to c/spacex@sh.itjust.works

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Starship, largest rocket ever built, just launched! Look at those shock waves!

Video from SpaceX twitter. https://nitter.net/SpaceX/status/1725879726479450297#m

top 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Look at those shock waves!

All 33 engines combining into a single large mach diamond was beautiful to see!

[–] piskertariot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Check some of the amateur video coming out. It was mach diamonds all the way down the plume.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

That sound never gets old.

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters	More Letters
AFTS	Autonomous Flight Termination System, see FTS
FTS	Flight Termination System

Jargon	Definition
Starlink	SpaceX's world-wide satellite broadband constellation

2 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 15 acronyms.

[Thread #18 for this sub, first seen 19th Nov 2023, 00:50] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[+] Sheeple@lemmy.world -35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You left out the part where it exploded before even truly gaining height. Why would you do that.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I wouldn't call 100+ km no height

Edit: looks like it got to about 150km in altitude and about 25k km/h

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

It also exploded after lifting the second stage to its desired speed, plus performed a hot stage, plus reoriented for the back boost burn and re-ignited before it blew up. This was a phenomenally successful flight for the first stage.

[–] olosta@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You hurt my brain with this kkm/h... I hate you. :)

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

25 Mm/h! Mega meters!

[–] xvlc@feddit.de 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Not sure where you got that impression from. The booster apparently worked flawlessly during ascent, with all 33 engines working until stage separation. Only 30s into the boostback burn, the AFTS triggered after several engines shut down prematurely. The second stage was deployed successfully, and completed most of its burn, before being lost only around half a minute before scheduled (sub)orbit insertion, around 3km/h short of the required velocity.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A lot of misinformation around every time SpaceX does anything, just look at the news headlines.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

People hate Elon (for very good reasons). But humans tend to believe that if a person is bad that literally everything they do must also be bad, hence the constant hate and misinformation every time SpaceX so much as sneezes.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

It is sad to see the achievements made by their thousands of engineers and technicians being downplayed

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

People hate Elon (for very good reasons).

Would you mind elaborating on exactly what reasons you are referring to? (I'm not intending to create an argument -- I'm genuinely just curious as to what you are specifically referring to).

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People dislike him for a lot of different reasons. One has been his disregard for workers' rights and safety. Another is his twitter posts/retweets/memes that put down or spread misinfo about different disadvantaged groups or minorities. His political views are... what you'd expect for someone who posts that, which most people aren't cool with. His influence over Starlink and terminals not working for the Ukrainian army in Crimea was a mess. When those kids were trapped in an underwater cave and some divers decided not to use his improvised mini-sub, he called one a pedo. He has had sexual harassment allegations. Etc etc.

Basically, he went from the quirky awkward rich guy making cars and rockets to a really annoying public figure with too much influence, some rough opinions, and no one telling him no.

(I'm a SpaceX fan and wish he would delete all social media, shut up, and focus. You know, like most CEOs of giant companies.)

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

His influence over Starlink and terminals not working for the Ukrainian army in Crimea was a mess.

Yeah this one is a pretty big issue, imo, that doesn't get enough attention. No one country, never mind a single private entity, should have this much global influence. In my opinion, this is a situation that showcases the necesity for some form of regulating world government.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He’s openly transphobic, for one.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Would you mind citing what leads you to make that statement? I'm not intending to refute your point with my question, I would just like to know, for the sake of conversational accuracy, exactly what you are referring to.