this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
105 points (100.0% liked)

Public Health

901 readers
53 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 26 points 1 week ago

This is so exciting! Also glad to see it’s based in Scotland which isn’t cancelling science at the moment.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

After just three months of enzyme inhibition, brain cells once on the brink of death were functioning more like those in healthy mice

I have nothing against mice, but I don't think I'd want my brain to function like theirs.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here's the thing: it does already. That's why mice are great early research animals.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Close enough" is not close enough.

No reason to think that Parkinson's would be any different.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

snicker you're citing incorrect data. You should be looking at how many wind up working in people that dont work in mice to make the argument you're trying to make.

You're also ignoring things that we outright reject because the side effects on mice are horrific.

And finally way to cherry pick your dataset.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Humans have no right to experiment on other living beings.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also this, but I thought it went without saying.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately carnists are still experimenting on animals.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Descartes should have just said "cogito ergo sum" and published his coordinate system and quit while he was ahead.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

congrats on having most unrelated comment of the day. in no way was i taking a position on the morality of animal testing. just the technical aspect of the current methods being used.

you'll note that their little quoted pamplet isnt talking about the morality of the use just making the completely incorrect claims that the animal models are useless. which is just plain incorrect.

until we figure out how to create synthetic human organs they're the best method for testing new medical procedures.