Firefox

20317 readers

241 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

1834

So tired of Adobe. They're part of the problem. (images4.imagebam.com)

submitted 2 years ago by jeena@jemmy.jeena.net to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

233 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/3376057

I held off on Windows 10 for as long as I could until my job required it. Now this nonsense. I hope this isn't the start of them joining on the web DRM bandwagon.

(page 5) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Legendsofanus@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

The image is not loading...

[–] jaff80@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Wow. Before, I could use it with no issues, but then recently, it would just randomly log me out (even on Chrome), so I had to use the app on the Microsoft Store. (Which I'm pretty sure is just a web browser)

[–] disconnectikacio@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why do you use adobe products? I tried Photoshop about 10 years ago, when i was developing a DLC for a game (multilayer textures up to 4096*4096 with addition, substract effects with AO map, normal, specular maps) it was totally ok with GIMP, but with photoshop it crashed as used about 6x more RAM than gimp for the same file 🤣 and i didnt see any improvement over GIMP. Maybe now it would be different due to the AI things in ps, or maybe not 😆

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

If you paid for Photoshop you should've gotten Inkscape and Substance Painter instead, much better for 3D assets

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I do appreciate that Firefox exists so that we have a choice to use something that isn't Chromium and mainly controlled by Google.

But from a business perspective, as Adobe, why would they devote developer time to supporting Firefox? Just to not piss off some nerds that care about that type of shit? What's that like 1% of the population?

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Firefox afaik is web standards compliant so if you make it work in Firefox, it'll work in all other browsers that are standards compliant (including Chromium based browsers).

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] FinallyDebunked@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is no revelation that this slow shit gradually moves into obscurity, if you can't catch up with the development of web and implement features on time you're out of competition

load more comments