this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
-56 points (40.1% liked)

/0 Governance

250 readers
13 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won't be voted in.

Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.

I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of "use with caution" instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user's personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.

For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that's why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.

On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we'll be happy to help you out.

Unruffled


Hi mateys. I'm gonna keep this short and sweet because I don't really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we'd prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.

This post isn't to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn't know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it's worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.

But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve ~~harmony~~a ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?

I'd also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.

Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?

Because this might be a divisive topic, I'm setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.

The proposal is as follows:

That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.

Notes

  • AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don't know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
  • We really don't want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
  • If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
  • I've covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I'll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.

expiry: 7

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] No_Bark@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I say refederate. We haven't blocked any of the turbolib instances, so I think we should let users themselves decide what instance to block.

Anecdotal, but I've never had an issue with Lemmygrad or Hexbear like so many people here constantly complain about. I find both instances preferable to most of the shit that appears from places like .world

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s gonna be a no from me, fam

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have not been on an instance that federates with it, so personally, I don’t know what the culture is like. I’m all for building bridges with ideological cousins - modern social media is one giant machine-propelled incubator of fascist sympathy nowadays, so I really do feel strongly about having a meaningful, robust, community-driven coalition of good people with good politics. I personally believe something like BlueSky has been a big black hole vacuuming up potential fediverse users, but you could make the case as well that it puts off our eternal September for more time. Maybe it’s not the worst thing that could happen.

That said, I do hear much worse feedback about grad than I do about .ml or Hexbear. At the same time, I understand that it is one of the main instances tied to the software’s development, and that alone makes it relevant to a big instance with a tech slant like ours, IMO.

I have to abstain. I think I’d like to vote Yay, but I don’t have all the information. I don’t know enough about grad to feel capable of making a judgement.

FWIW a lot of the .ml and Hexbear bashing is ridiculous, IMO. All the complaints about a “triad” and subsequent positive interactions on these two instances have made them seem unfairly maligned to me. Maybe it’s because I live in a part of the world where politics and political violence is even more messy, and the concept of “critical support” is much more clear to me. I don’t have west-as-default baggage. So a lot of what comes off to others as apologia for states that do bad things doesn’t necessarily bother me as much as it would bother someone else. I’ve seen more frequent egregious takes on .world and ShJW. Some of those guys legitimately want Israel to turn my home into a parking lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m voting no, I’m against it.

I’m of the mindset that if there’s already been a decision to defederate, there should be a very good reason to consider refederating. After looking at the posts over there it seems pretty dead. I don’t think there’s anything of any quality being missed, and I don’t personally see any reason why we should undo the defederation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 6daemonbag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm clearly in the minority here, but I'm in favor of a trial refederation.

Support.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Federate and let people block the instance themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Opening lines of dialogue can be a good thing. I like that it’s set up with a trial period. If it creates problems, they can be dealt with quickly and permanently closed off shortly after.

We live in an online ecosystem designed to encourage divisiveness and anger. I personally think it’s a good thing to hear viewpoints outside of your comfort zone. People of differing ideologies have way more in common with each other than with the billionaires and their bootlicking armies that try to divide everyone for their own benefit.

Ceterum censeo Epstein didn’t kill himself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs.

Same. There's a difference between socialism, anarchism, communitarianism, communism, etc., and too many turbo libs chock all of that rich political tapestry up to "tankies".

While I do think there are dictator apologists out there, I don't see the down side to open communication so long as there's healthy debate. As soon as ad hominems are introduced, where people are attacked and not their ideas, I think that's when we draw the line.

I don't really have any experience with lemmygrad though. Hexbear I've started warming up to. As with Lemmy.ml

Edit: I'd say let's try the month period and see what happens. And if this doesn't work, I don't think that should be the last time we try to federate. We should elect to keep an open mind to see if things change. I do think that dbzer0 should allow users to block entire instances though. One of the reasons I came to dbzer0 is because lemmy.world banned too many instances that I was interested in.

So yeah, count me in. Aye

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] onoira@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

my feed's pretty barren after blocking most libshit (for the sake of my mental health), so i'd welcome more (multilingual) leftist posts. i've seen insightful Lemmygraders under Hexbear posts but can't see them from dbzer0.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fantasyocean@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Boo, no tankies.

TBH though, whatever you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd be willing to give it a try. They can be frustrating at times, but to me it's not really worse than with liberal instances. I'd understand if the community here doesn't want to put up with them though.

I haven't checked it out in a couple years, but I remember there being several decent communities over there. But their more authoritarian communities are pretty shitty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Aye for a trial.

I'm an adult; I think I can block users and communities on a case-by-case basis. If it becomes unbearable, I can still vote no at the end of the trial.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think a trial is a very reasonable thing to conduct, I support a trial run

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (4 children)

No, I don't like giving a voice to absurd extremists.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I find the average user less grating than the average world or ohshitit'sjustfash users. There's some fucking wankers but hey it's the internet.

Good to get perspectives critical of the imperial core and usually more insightful than the average conservative/lib take. Like I might think that glazing NK is hilarious, but it's not like you don't find hundreds of users glazing farcial "representative" democracies constantly which are only marginally further along in terms of real freedom to act in a way contrary to the nation state.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I see NO reason to change that. The instance itself is almost empty (judging by their top-week as guest), it's content usually crossposted from\to ml\hex. My only concern is blocking it's non-powerusers, but I doubt there are many who use this instance exclusively.

If people on lg.ml are comfortable with db0 defed, let it stay, because I feel like not our but their feeds would be filled with db0 posts up to the point they'd defed themselves.

I'm not against trial, but I find it rather pointless. Most of us won't even notice that besides spam reposts with rare if ever interactions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I was not here for the original drama, but more potential leftist intersectionalism is never bad, esspecially when there is a flare-up of Fascism.

so Aye, let's refederate them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RavingGrob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm in for a trial. Different viewpoints are good, and worst case scenario, we just defed again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Aye, yes, I think a trial period is reasonable.

If it gets bad we can defed again, but I think we should try to be as federated as possible, especially with other leftist instances

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No.

I'd just block it on individual level then same as hex

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A very tacit yes? If it's in the interest of opening up discourse, I think a trial could be good. If this contributes to a healthy discourse, then it's fine by me. If we just invite them to be the auth-left aga-toad to our lib snake problem, hell no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hellstormy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes for a trial. I personally have gotten used to just blocking users/communities I don't want to see/interact with anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I've had nothing but good experiences with hexbear in my lemmy history, I think, but then again I value more the communities than the users, and thus I prefer instances that won't arbitrarily keep me from getting good content from elsewhere. I tend to not track where a user is in the Fediverse - every internet dog is free to create accounts anywhere, anyway.

But... comparatively speaking, lg.ml seems to have little if anything to offer in comparison. The "tinted left" stuff that I care about can be more easily found in l.ml anyway.

I'd say give it a two weeks trial. A full month might be a bit too much, both for the people pro and con.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] afc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yes. We need to expand the chiral network.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whysofurious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm in favour of this tbh. I wouldn't even put a supermajority on this. Why? Because people can just block entire instances on their end.

IMO it's not up to instances to limit user's feeds and interactions, unless OFC there is significant amounts of malicious intent, behaviour etc. on the other end.

Personally I often don't see eye to eye with them and dislike their revisionism and acceptance of Dengism, but if they're anything like Hexbear, they'll have some genuine leftist tenencies.

EDIT: If we don't get the supermajority, we can always go for a trial period and see how things go from there. I suspect that it'll be similar to hexbear

Also please, anything to balance the shitlibs from .world.

On another note: it's curious how .worlders often having the most reactionary takes, but some PPL here seem to have no issues with that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Giving it a trial run might be okay though I'd lean towards leaving things as-is.

Does kind of feel like the overall community wouldn't be too thrilled. I'm having a hard time understanding why the instance would be entertaining a change now. Like I can't think of any communities I care to participate in over there, just seems like spamming up people's All feed for no discernible benefit.

OTOH you have a point, people can do instance blocking in their user settings so that is an option.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›