this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
430 points (89.4% liked)

memes

16867 readers
3966 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Lots of drip though

[–] superduperpirate@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think Maude Lebowski was a better painter

[–] cattywampas@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I find her work strongly vaginal which bothers me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Yeah, yeah op. You have no idea of the what's and why's or any context for why plenty of modern art looks like it does and why it is important in art history. You know what you like. And you like what you understand. And if you don't understand it, you feel intellectually lesser and have a knee jerk reaction to protect yourself - by taking a meme format that says you have all the smarts and people that understand it are below yourself.

You can keep doing that, or you can get curious and ask the what's and the why's and see if you can appreciate things from it that aren't immediately obvious. That is how people grow.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Tbf lots of stuff in that style, including some of his, is trash.

Edit: and if context is beauty: a lot of people making it didn't understand, and it was overpromoted by the fucking cia to contrast the literal style pushed by the ussr. So it's literally an anti-communist plot by yhe cia. Show me some other 'anti communist' things.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yep. If you look into history there are plenty of examples of political powers promoting arts of all tradition for their own purposes.

But you know who were on the fronts of practically banning modern art in the first place? Check out Entartete Kunst, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_art. So does that make all traditional and figurative art problematic now?

And you know what other art was "not understood" by it's creators until later? Oh, boy. Fucking most of it, because a lot of art is expression and exploration, and theory is the understanding after, despite academics and theorists in fine arts have been trying to center the entire scene around themselves rather than the artists for the better part of the 1900s until today.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You're equating an appreciation of significance with an appreciation of aesthetics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I must like the emperor's new clothes!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)

Okay, how about "It's shit, but I think it looks nice."?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›