this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
786 points (99.9% liked)

politics

25260 readers
2105 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Wow, she got the same deal Acosta got for Epstein? She gonna traffick for POTUS directly, now?

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If the maxwellhill account suddenly becomes active again by someone other than a guy replying in PMs who admits to be a lawyer every time people point at it and VICE suddenly begins releasing articles about how she has been reformed into an asset for this administration, this will be some dark comedy hilarious type shit.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Is this a reputable source? I'm not seeing it anywhere else.

[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

That classic CSI style interrogation scene where a prisoner gets rewarded for providing nothing of value to an investigation …

[–] egerlach@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Let them eat cake" - Ghislane Maxwell, probably.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I think she has cake in her van. Gotta go with her to get it though.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In all seriousness, what was she doing right before getting caught? I remember some TED talking bullshit about climate change or something.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 4 days ago

Trafficking kids.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

It's hard work draining the swamp

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

So they did work out a deal with her, haven't they?

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Wow. Just fucking WOW.

This shit is really happening.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

Hope she's not working around minors.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Kid fuckers gonna fuck.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The Chomo-in-cheif is in need of a secretary.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›