this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
795 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

74055 readers
5826 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When will genAI be so good, it'll solve its own energy crisis?

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 13 points 1 day ago

Most certainly it won't happen until after AI has developed a self-preservation bias. It's too bad the solution is turning off the AI.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Current genAI? Never. There's at least one breakthrough needed to build something capable of actual thinking.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I have to test it with Copilot for work. So far, in my experience its "enhanced capabilities" mostly involve doing things I didn't ask it to do extremely quickly. For example, it massively fucked up the CSS in an experimental project when I instructed it to extract a React element into its own file.

That's literally all I wanted it to do, yet it took it upon itself to make all sorts of changes to styling for the entire application. I ended up reverting all of its changes and extracting the element myself.

Suffice to say, I will not be recommending GPT 5 going forward.

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sounds like you forgot to instruct it to do a good job.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GenChadT@programming.dev 19 points 2 days ago (11 children)

That's my problem with "AI" in general. It's seemingly impossible to "engineer" a complete piece of software when using LLMs in any capacity that isn't editing a line or two inside singular functions. Too many times I've asked GPT/Gemini to make a small change to a file and had to revert the request because it'd take it upon itself to re-engineer the architecture of my entire application.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

We moved to m365 and were encouraged to try new elements. I gave copilot an excel sheet, told it to add 5% to each percent in column B and not to go over 100%. It spat out jumbled up data all reading 6000%.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago

It's the same tech. It would have to be bigger or chew through "reasoning" tokens to beat benchmarks. So yeah, of course it is.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Photographer1: Sam, could you give us a goofier face?

*click* *click*

Photographer2: Goofier!!

*click* *click* *click* *click*

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Looks like he's going to eat his microphone

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›