this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
326 points (96.6% liked)

World News

49188 readers
2273 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dantheta@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Reminds me of the West Wing episode with the Petersen (?) projection map. Although I seem to remember that map format was under copyright and would have required a fee for every use. An intended consequence?

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Beat me to it. Except it's more like 25 years. Now get off my lawn.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Such a beautiful scene.

"But you can't do that!"

"Why not?"

"Because you're freaking me out!"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok come up with something that's better and just as practical.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They did. They are specifically advocating for the Equal Earth projection.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Like completely, or just as a default?

It's uniquely the best option if you like using compass bearings.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Or just want a map that you can cut a small piece (up to a square 10° of longitude) from and have it just work (no skewing or non-proportional scaling required) although non-interactive world maps should use Robinson, Winkel-Tripel or something.

Of course, "a square 10° of latitude", while the same size on the full map, will cover different areas. The side length is approximately:

  • 1110 km near the equator (0°)
  • 960 km in North/South Africa or Florida (30°)
  • 790 km in NYC, Venice or south NZ (45°)
  • 558 km in Oslo, Anchorage or northernmost Antarctic islands (60°)
  • 289 km in central Greenland, northernmost peninsula of Russia or Canada or southernmost sea (75°)
  • at higher latitudes, approx. 𝑥 km when 6𝑥 km from the pole

If you're at the Amundsen-Scott research station, a square 10° of latitude won't do, as it covers just about your bed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

I think equal area maps make a lot of sense, but the one I’ve seen promoted in the past as “fair” is the Peters Projection which is quite frankly trash.

It was designed to preserve angles at the equator, and as a consequence all the shapes at higher latitudes are badly squished in the vertical.

If there has to be distortion to preserve areas, it should squish in both dimensions and try to optimize shapes around the middle latitudes.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's why I use the dymaxian projection

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Gall-Peters 4EVA!

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looking at the correct map makes it clear that our Risk Continent Troop values need updated now.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love how big Ukraine is on the Risk map.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (6 children)

16th century? Huh I would have expected a far more accurate version would have been made and accepted long ago.

Especially since during all the centuries since then accurate navigation was needed, even around Afrika, and not make journeys last far longer by keeping an incorrect map.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

I always that that countries made their own maps and always centered themselves on it.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

I personally think that Eckert IV is a little more visually pleasing while otherwise achieving all the same benefits as Equal Earth, but both are good

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›