this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025

81 points (87.2% liked)

Technology

74217 readers

4360 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

Social media influencer Andrew Tate sues Meta, TikTok for over $50 million for ‘deplatforming’ him (globalnews.ca)

submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I hate both, so I enjoy seeing them fight each other.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 98 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

You misspelled "rapist and sex trafficker who looks like Gollum"

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

Dont insult gollum!!!

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 24 points 20 hours ago

Why you gotta do my man Sméagol like that?

[–] jmd_akbar@aussie.zone 21 points 21 hours ago

Now that's just unfair on poor Gollum... 😜

[–] f1error@thelemmy.club 7 points 14 hours ago

Andrew Tate can suck my 'andy taint! I will happily fight this pedo/sex trafficker.

I'm 54, overweight, and out of shape, and I'll take this windbag out forever. Yeah, permanently.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 38 points 20 hours ago

Ladies and gentlemen! Line up to see conservative influences turn against free enterprise if it means that businesses are allowed to deny service to shitbags, and then twist and contort themselves to support it once again when a bakery refuses to make a cake for a gay wedding!

[–] arin@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Isn't andrew tate in a Romania prison for child sex trafficking?

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 9 points 14 hours ago

Lol, only if he were a lot poorer and a lot less white. That mother fucker launched a UK political party, acquired citizenship to Vanuatu, and rubbed elbows with the American Right in Florida. All within 2025 year to date.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Oh discovery ought to be interesting.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 11 points 20 hours ago

Trump will pitch a fit and big tech will settle and reinstate Tater Tots accounts.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 9 points 19 hours ago

Hey look, it's a miracle. A sack of shit has started to speak!

Oh...wait...it's just Andrew Tate, my mistake.

Why has nobody cleaned that thing off the surface of the Earth yet?

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 8 points 20 hours ago

[+] darkkite@lemmy.ml -12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who used tiktok when he was a meme with the French song, it was a blatant action done against him. They (shadow) banned all the tiktok accounts making edits of him, they modified search results to put the official new sources relating to him at the top, hiding the user-generated content. Note, they did the same thing during the California wildfires to show only verified account videos to hide misinformation.

I think Tate is a grifter, but we really shouldn't let governments or big tech companies to artificially hide content because someone is a controversial figure.

You currently cannot search 'hitler' on tiktok at all. It's all a slippery slope that led to age verification, chat control, etc.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So get off of those platforms. Stop giving them that power.

There isn’t going to be some heroic government that will come in and make Silicon Valley and other assorted media owning billionaires suddenly behave like careful stewards of online discourse.

Nothing that they’re doing is illegal, you read the TOS, right? They have no incentive to change. Stoking outrage drives engagement and keeps the money rolling in.

It won’t affect them in any meaningful way. They can just move away if they accidentally tear a society apart.

[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I go where the relevant content is. I clearly don't mind using alternative social media like Lemmy, but tiktok has great creators and indie music that I wouldn't be exposed to anywhere else.

I use multiple social networks to prevent bias with adblockers to limit how much money they make.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

Sometimes doing the right thing means making sacrifices.

I’d rather miss out on some content than support these systems that give a handful of rich narcissists control over all news and discourse in the western world.

[+] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world -14 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I hate that he is doing it, but this needed to happen sooner than later. I just wish it was someone that was ‘deplatformed’ for no good reason… they will find many reasons to deplatform him.

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago

Private platforms have every right to ban you, even if they just don't like you or your political beliefs. Censorship is mostly happening by the government and systematic media.

And that is why federated platforms are so important. If most people don't wanna see someone's bullshit they can ban him. And he has the right to run his own instance.

Note that I'm not defending Tate here. Many of his words and actions are actually harmful or hateful and he deserves to be arrested.

But there's a line between "illegal/harmful" and "unlikeable" which we need to remember.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Sorta agreed, but the ruling could set a bad precedent if he wins.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I'm sure Trump will see many, many great and fabulous reasons to re-platform him.

Well why, would you look at that, a fellow rapist, and he's a trafficker too?! Hey, Elon, Suck, promote this man NOW!