this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
-14 points (32.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

37292 readers
1522 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] remon@ani.social 16 points 1 month ago

We would call it a robot if it is a robot. Doesn't matter how it was made. So really there is no logic that supports the 2nd statement.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah we would, it's the end product not the production that defines it. Same way we refer to cars as cars even tho there's been robots building them for decades.

[–] pocker_machine@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I understand we would. I just left a shower thought on the possibility that an entity, if exists, called God would. Not trying to be pedantic here, just an amusing thought. 🙂

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That point quickly devolves into "What would a hypothetical being that's completely different from us and not knowable do?"

Or to put it differently: "What would something we can't understand be like?"

It's kind of a moot question to ask since the question already defines that there is no answer.

[–] pocker_machine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Interesting. Yes we are reducing the not knowable to knowable, which is moot.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 2 points 1 month ago

Sall good, I was just stoned replying.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I kinda like this one. it's got a "hidden step" in which if humans are created by gods, we are robots to those gods.

[–] pocker_machine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yes exactly

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, then we'd be called gods and so would the robots.

Ray, when someone asks you if you're a God, you say YES!

[–] pocker_machine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Interesting

[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

If god created us in his own image, then we are gods, and so are robots.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's no "God". So, this doesn't work at all.

[–] pocker_machine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m not saying there is one. It’s just a thought experiment

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then you should've watched your wording. Either way... there is no thing as a "God".

[–] pocker_machine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I’ll leave you to your thoughts. Have a good day