this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
104 points (99.1% liked)

news

89 readers
924 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 20 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Didn't Roberts say at one point that he's not owned by anyone? Apparently, he lied.

On Tuesday, Chief Justice John Roberts rewarded the Trump administration’s lawless revocation of $4 billion in foreign aid by freezing a lower court order that had required the government to distribute the money. Roberts’ intervention is an ominous indication that the full court may soon greenlight the president’s “pocket rescission” of funds expressly appropriated by Congress. This decision would hand Donald Trump a sweeping spending power that the Constitution does not assign to him while hobbling democratic, environmental, and humanitarian projects abroad. As Congress enters a fight over government funding, Democrats should keep a close eye on the Supreme Court—because if the justices do bless this duplicitous maneuver, there will be little point in negotiating over appropriations that Trump can simply refuse to spend.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Honestly, if he's allowed to do whatever he wants with funding regardless of Congress then Democrats literally shouldn't negotiate. Give them absolutely fucking nothing because that's what their word, their promises, their laws mean. Nothing.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

His cycle of existence should have ended in a waded up napkin