this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
455 points (96.5% liked)

Curated Tumblr

5926 readers
573 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

remember kids, it doesn't need to be difficult to make to be art, it just needs to make you think of it as art

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 90 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Fountain is unfathomably based. I've used this history lesson to reassure my cousin who started painting for his PTSD and got told by a bunch of shitheads that he wasn't a "Real Artist" when he sold some art.

This stuff is a litmus test for when you're in a culture war with people trying to hide the fact they're warring with you on every front they can

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 22 points 20 hours ago (15 children)

Only people who don't understand art say that people "aren't real artists." It's the most obvious way to know that someone's opinion isn't worth listening to.

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You're only "not an artist" if you're not making art. If you make something and don't want it to be art, then it's not art, and you're not an artist.

That's about it as not artist goes.

[–] tpyo@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That got me thinking;
a welder creating a sculpture: artist

a welder making a tool: artisan

Is the tool a functional piece of art?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 35 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If he sold art he's definitely an artist.

If he hadn't sold any he would be too, but selling it is undsniable proof that someone else across him as an artist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 63 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They say “traditional art”, but they mean “shut up and paint, with no subversive messages hidden”.

But the thing is, the time period they consider “traditional art” is chock full of artists being told to “shut up and paint”, and not appreciating that very much and deciding to sneak subversive messages into their works, knowing that their patrons would be too dumb to catch on.

In effect, they’re saying “can we go back to a time when I didn’t understand that you thought I was dumb?”

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 33 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Shall we talk about Caravaggio? Most notably Basket of fruit?

He was an atheist sneaking anti-church messages in his church-bought paintings. Iirc he got found out a couple of times and people weren’t super happy if being played for fools.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I was one of those people who derided “Fountain,” until about thirty seconds ago. Thank you for this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 24 points 23 hours ago (100 children)

People who hate on modern art are either too stupid to understand it or afraid of it.

Like you don't have to like or love it, but imagine saying it's not art...

load more comments (100 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›