Technology
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
Bandwagon, Faircamp, Love a Brother Radio, The Indie Beat. Probably not what you're looking for, but direct creator support, Fedi powered, all wonder folks.
Also gonna suggest Mirlo.space as it's open sourced.
Old fart checking in ... why not just buy the tracks instead of paying for monthly access that screws artists? I mean, each song is unlikely to be more than $1.49, and then you own it. I don't have a streaming music account and never will because the idea of paying repeatedly for the same thing -- with the option of it being pulled at any time -- is nauseating.
Why would I? Pay $1.49 to listen to 1 song over and over or pay $12 to listen to basically the entirety of human creation any time I want? Not to mention custom playlists and whatnot.
My music collection spans some 1,700 tracks and several full albums. It's not difficult to create local playlists, I don't pay monthly, and I don't have an excessive data plan because I need streaming. Look at the knock-on costs. It's not $12/month.
I listen to probably at least a dozen new songs every day. If I bought them that would cost me $18/day. Or $540/mo. Not to mention the absolute fortune required to store them all locally.
My 1,700 tracks, most at 320kpbs, take up 20GB. Albums add another 4GB. My four-year-old phone has 256GB of storage. I'm not sure where this "fortune" comes from. Especially when you're paying extra for data monthly just to stream. You're still spending the money, just pretending it's unrelated to music.
You could still do that without paying Spotify. Then you could go and buy the music you liked each month.
I have to pay someone 🤷 at least legally, anyway
I'm in the phase of my life where if I encounter a new track I like in the wild, I'll buy it. But I'm not seeking out new stuff because (cracks open a PBR and grows a goatee) everything feels homogenized today.
Perhaps it's just different use cases. Still, you're dependent on a company to be able to continue listening to the music you like. That's worrisome. If a company took away the collection I've been building since the '80s, livid wouldn't begin to explain my reaction.
if I encounter a new track I like in the wild, I'll buy it.
How do you "encounter" new tracks?
But I'm not seeking out new stuff because...everything feels homogenized today.
If you're not actively seeking out new music, it will feel that way, because you're just listening to whatever is on the radio or on TV or whatever. This is the beauty of streaming platforms. In the past you were only ever exposed to whatever music the record companies decided you should hear. And it was almost exclusively homogenous "pop" music, to some degree. With streaming music you can discover new music every day based on your personal preferences.
OK. Lots of assumptions here. I haven't listened to the radio since the '90s, and I've never paid for cable.
My preferred genres are progressive house and trance, and I got into the rave scene about the time I stopped listening to the radio. I started my collection via fservs on IRC, ratio FTP sites and then Napster and P2P, totally obviating the record labels. I'm subscribed to various music producers on YouTube for when I'm thinking I want something new, and if it makes me cry, off to Beatport I go.
So, like, not to be rude, but you got every assumption wrong.
Lots of assumptions here.
you got every assumption wrong.
Zero assumptions here, you said you were, and I quote, "not seeking out new stuff", I didn't assume that.
I'm subscribed to various music producers on YouTube
So you DO enjoy streaming music...
I hope you enjoyed feeling like you had a "gotcha" moment. When on my computer, yeah, I watch some YouTube, but mostly news and late-night monologues. I sure as shit don't pay for it.
I have no interest in "gotcha moments". Just having a discussion about the virtues of streaming music platforms vs. buying.
If you don't pay for it then you are pirating, which is a whole other discussion.
"If you don't pay for it then you are pirating" is not a discussion, it's an erroneous blanket statement.
Why? They have more prog than the others. Believe me, I’d love to stick with Qobuz as the sound quality is magnificent. Unfortunately they just don’t have the music I listen to.
I had this problem at first, then I realized there's so much music I never listened to before and I have enough new music between Qobuz and Bandcamp that I'm satisfied. But I see your point. I have pirated some music when the creator don't allow me to purchase the songs.
this is an awesome video on why other streaming services are just marginally better than spotify and not a long term solution: https://youtu.be/gDfNRWsMRsU
with that in mind i’m trying to transition away from streaming but am using tidal as what i hope is the least bad option for now.
It's the same old reason as always. Most users value their convenience more than anything.
I'm still on Pandora and honestly have no idea how they stack up. I just use it as a radio station on long drives.
Why?
-
Lack of Feature Parity
-
Stickiness of library transfer
-
Stickiness of social network effects
-
It's still better ethically than Apple Music or YouTube Music, which behave anti-competitively
1: I've tried out Quobuz, it's pretty good, but it does not have the Jam / Group Session feature which me and my friends use constantly while gaming remotely. It also does not have an Xbox app which I use while playing games. I find Spotify's recommendations somewhat underwhelming, but Quobuz has a noticeably worse recommendation engine, at least for my genres and tastes. Those are the features that lack parity that matter to me, but for some others, it's things like amplifiers having built-in Spotify, or there being a Roku or Playstation app or something.
2: Quobuz uses a third party service to automatically transfer your library, which worked pretty well, but did require jumping through a bunch of hoops and subscribing to a trial subscription that I then had to cancel. It also did not find matches for some songs. Could I make it work if I had enough reason to switch? Yeah, probably, but the lack of feature parity (/roadmap that includes them) is enough to dissuade me from really trying.
3: In addition to friends on Spotify all using Jams, there's also an inherent niceness to just being able to text people Spotify links, especially since there's no cross platform linking service that would otherwise make sharing music easy.
4: Supporting Spotify may not be great, but its still better than supporting trillion dollar anti-competitive corporations like Apple and Google.