this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
513 points (86.5% liked)

Technology

75300 readers
4261 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive.is link to article from allabout.ai at https://www.allaboutai.com/resources/ai-statistics/ai-environment/

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maccam912@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago (7 children)

What does it mean to consume water? Like it's used to cool something and then put back in a river? Or it evaporates? It's not like it can be used in some irrecoverable way right?

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

I kind of wondered the same thing in the past, but the other day I read an LA Times article that illustrated the extent of the problem of water loss (not particularly related to data centers although we know they contribute to it). The main problem with evaporating water seems to be that it was water that we could have used which ended up in the ocean instead.

https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2025-09-03/global-drying-groundwater-depletion

I infer that evaporation is worse than flushing it down the drain, so to speak, because if it were flushed you would at least be able to treat and recover much of it using much less energy than recovering it from the ocean. So it sounds like evaporation is largely (but obviously not completely) a one-way street, especially in arid regions, since only a tiny portion of the evaporated water would come back there as rain.

[–] morto@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

if they take the water and don't return to the source, there will be less available water in the water body, and it can lead to scarcity. If they take it and return, but at a higher temperature, or along with pollutants, it can impact the life in the water body. If they treat the water before returning, to be closest to the original properties, there will be little impact, but it means using more energy and resources for the treatment

[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 4 days ago

"using" water tends to mean that it needs to be processed to be usable again. you "use" water by drinking it, or showering, or boiling pasta too.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think the point is that it evaporates and may return as rain, which is overwhelmingly acid rain or filled with microplastics or otherwise just gets dirty and needs to be cleaned or purified again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 6 points 4 days ago

Bitcoin or crypto?

[–] boovard@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Barely ever used it just for that reason and the fact that the algorithms are getting worse by the day. But now my work is forcing us to use it. To increase productivity you see...

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I wonder how one gets banned from using these tools without just spraying non stop paste's of expletives in to the chat box

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

I stopped l, not that I used it that much, about 5 months ago.

[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk 5 points 4 days ago

It's using energy, we need more renewables. That's not a problem with AI. Direct your opprobrium where it belongs

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago

This is my main issue with it. I think its useful enough but only if it uses about the same energy as you would use doing whatever without it. Most conversations I had with someone trying to convince me it does not use to much power end up being very much like crypto ones were it keeps on being apples to oranges and the energy consumption seems to much. Im hoping hardware can be made to get the power use lower the way graphics cards did. I want to see querying an llm using about the same as searching for the answer or lower.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Generating bullshit that isn't really that useful.

Remember when the Apple Newton "revolutionized" computing with handwriting recognition?

No, of course not, because the whole thing sucked and vanished outside of old Doonesbury cartoons. LOL

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

My peer used the newton for comp sci class notes. Daily. Exclusively.

Then she went on to mastermind the behaviour and tactics of Myth: The Fallen Lords.

It's tenuous, but I say that's causal.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›