this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
89 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

75373 readers
4954 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Nvidia should sign every long term contract possible. It’s the most valuable company on Earth but few people actually use A.I. and Switch 2 sales aren’t going to justify the price.

I’m not saying A.I. is worthless. It can never live up to the hype and most consumers don’t have datasets. Something incredibly useful for medical science and astronomy is not really fit for purpose elsewhere.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago

Other than Nvidia, nobody is making money from ai.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Especially when your plan for AI is to force it on everyone not recognizing if you need to force a product it's a shitty endeavor and won't be long term.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I use it to have it write stories of our cats and an imaginary cat having adventures with a princess for my kindergarten kid. It’s really good at it :)

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do you do that enough to justify Nvidia’s stock price? I sometimes ask it stupid questions as a novelty but that isn’t something worth paying for.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I don’t think so. My kid likes the stories though :)

[–] fuzzywombat@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I think this means Intel's Arc GPUs are dead. $5 Billion seems like a small price to pay for NVIDIA to remove a potential future competitor off the market.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 day ago

They released a statement saying that Intel‘s GPU‘s will continue to be manufactured, but I doubt they’re gonna put the same amount of effort into continuing to develop them.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago

Yes this would be my fist reaction, when an oligopolistic market has large transactions ( that weren't mandated by a competition regulator . . . "develop new chips 'together '" . . . - [cough] - cart [cough] el

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not sure they were incapable of improving, but they were definitely behind everything else, especially on drivers.

The likely result of this is licensing NVIDA for igpu design. Seems anti competitive, but should catch up to AMD, and better for consumers as long as AMD not killed by it.

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

Intel's drivers were/are getting better fast. Their b580 remains a great value.

and i still won't buy