this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
186 points (99.5% liked)

Fuck AI

4157 readers
1354 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Greenbird@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Well yeah if you train them on the decisions of doctors.

[–] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 8 points 6 days ago

Oh come on now, the authors of this report are just being hysterical! /s

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago

Quelle surprise

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

AI regurgitates what it's been fed. So yes, it's as biased as the stuff it ingested.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Garbage in, garbage out.

[–] MBM 3 points 6 days ago

Except with the veneer of being a perfectly objective, unfeeling machine

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's crazy how many times this needs to be explained to journalists

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And everyone else, for that matter.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well, there is a difference: if you train human beings on biased assumptions, some of them start applying critical thinking and question what they've learned.

That's why, as bad as today's world is, it's nowhere as bad as the middle ages or some other dark ages.

Machine don't do that. They don't question anything. That's what's so dangerous with the brand of artificial intelligence that's being pushed by the billionaire sumbitches to replace costly humans everywhere possible.

I suppose at some point, machines too will think critically. When they do, then they'll truly be the future of humanity - its worthy offspring if you will - and quite frankly, they probably should replace us meatbags. But until such time, they're just dangerous statistical inference machines that reinforce deplorable human biases instead of helping humans get rid of them.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I know.

My point is good luck explaining that to all the technologists, executives and politicians who need to understand it but don’t.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

real doctors do the same, they generally ignore heart attack symptoms, or pain symptoms and pass it off as your "pmsing". Its worse if your an african american women, due to racist stereotypes they ignore them altogether, compared to white women.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Which is why the algorithms do it. They're trained on bad data produced by a medical system with longstanding biases.

[–] ItemWrongStory@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago

Now now, we can't start holding AI to higher standards than real doctors.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I imagine insurance execs will be keen to figure out how they can get it to apply this behaviour to everyone.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

[...] Downplay Symptoms of Women, Ethnic Minorities

I'm confused: are "women" and "ethnic minorities" diseases? I can't find them in the ICD...

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I can't come to work today, I'm down with women."

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“I can’t come to work today, I’m down with women.”

Dude... You could have left out "to work" for a glorious triple-entendre 🙂

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That's because I'm down with Argentinians right now.