this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
462 points (99.8% liked)

Android

31994 readers
142 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm confused by this:

The F-Droid project cannot require that developers register their apps through Google, but at the same time, we cannot “take over” the application identifiers for the open-source apps we distribute, as that would effectively seize exclusive distribution rights to those applications.

If it were to be put into effect, the developer registration decree will end the F-Droid project and other free/open-source app distribution sources as we know them today, and the world will be deprived of the safety and security of the catalog of thousands of apps that can be trusted and verified by any and all. F-Droid’s myriad users5 will be left adrift, with no means to install — or even update their existing installed — applications.

My understanding is that developers need to sign up with Google and once they have an account they can sign their own apks.

How would this impact F-Droid in any way? Presumably by the time F-Droid enters the picture the developers of the apps they distribute would have already gone through that entire process, right? The apks will be tied to that new Google certificate, but after that they can still be distributed anywhere.

I mean, don't get me wrong, this has genuine, very serious, dealbreaking issues, in that Google can just cancel the account of a developer making apps they don't like, the same way Apple has done in the past. That's not great. But from F-Droid's perspective all of that has happened upstream, they are not anywhere in that loop, unless I've misunderstood the changes.

[–] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My understanding is that developers need to sign up with Google and once they have an account they can sign their own apks.

Yes, and google asks for identification from the developers, and a lot of open source developers - having privacy in mind - don't want to provide personal information. This is shitty beyond anything google has done before.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

"Want" isn't my concern. Presumably no developers want to give Google a piece of anything they generate, open source or not.

My concern was not understanding how this interferes with F-Droid and that has been explained above: F-Droid builds their own APKs for verification and this process potentially makes that a lot harder while not providing a replacement for their verification from Google.

That makes sense and it is indeed a dealbreaker. The other thing much less so.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

wellp. time to go back to a time where phones were phones and not much more. i don't need a smart phone, i barely wanted one to begin with. i just want a way to talk to people, send sms with a T9 keyboard, listen to preloaded MP3s and maybe play snake.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

Nokias are back, maybe see if you can get one where you are

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›