this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
338 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

16919 readers
2662 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vateso5074@lemmy.world 48 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (4 children)

I almost kinda dislike the messaging on this one because it implies authoritarianism is the key to discovery. Scientists are implied to be passive and unindustrious when left alone, so the government (FBI-type characters) declare a truth they want proven, force development of it through the threat of violence, and it eventually yields an answer they're happy with.

I'm reminded of the film The Death of Stalin and it's depiction of the USSR's treatment of bourgeois intellectuals like doctors.

that's a great film. it's on my annual watch list, will update the date i watch it on when appropriate.

[–] JohnAnthony@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago

My interpretation was that pink lady shouted out some crap formula FBI guy does not understand anyway so they would be left alone again.

Last panel half contradicts it, half just leans harder into the absurdity of it all. I wouldn't expect physicists to care much about Rubik's Cubes, I think even the cliché fits mathematicians much better.

Basically, my spontaneous takeaway was "government and media are so science-illiterate that nobody understands anyone anymore".

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 42 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I interpreted the opposite; once they were freed from day to day bullshit, they were able to reach new discoveries the way 20th century hiking scientists

[–] vateso5074@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago

That's how I read the intent of the author, at least. Getting scientists out of their isolated bubbles and allowing them to actually experience the world drives innovation.

That, or the one physicist who figured it out was so traumatized by merely being outside that she figured it out as quickly as possible to make it all stop, haha.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 67 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I guess that's the joke - this is so stupid and obviously won't work, but that perspective is subverted when it turns out to actually work, causing humour.

I quite like it.

[–] vateso5074@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Fair, I guess I'm just letting the world get to me!

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 7 points 12 hours ago

Read more SMBC, it might help! Or give you more anxiety. But at least you'll be smiling.

[–] ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

I take umbrage with the idea that gravity is necessarily quantisable- for all we know, it can’t be quantised.

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Sounds like someone needs to go for a walk

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Is gravity originates from an interaction of mass and distance, and both are quantized, doesn't it necessarily follow that gravity is also quantized?

Disclaimer: I am not a physicist.

[–] ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We actually don’t know if distance is quantised- while distances smaller than the Planck length don’t make any sense with our current understanding of physics, that doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s the quantum of distance.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

No actually the blue dream bunny told me its hops are quantized, ergo distance must be quantized.

they were referring to beer hops not jump hops.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

ugg fiiine you can try to gravitize quantum mechanics, if you really must

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, quantum fields all rest on another dimensional layer. The quantum foam experiences a weak cohesion force that doesnt drop off with distance. This results in clustering of the foam, resulting in clustering of the deeper field. This is emergent on the macroscopic scale as the folding of space time, which is really just the tendancy of energy to condense on the quantum scale.

Or maybe partical interactions being dependant on locality results in a sort of local energy spike as the two particles get closer. This results in time dilation between the two particles, altering the expected rate at which their interactions would occur, effectively setting a hard limit on how close two particles can get without fusing. This time dilation could also be responsible for the emergent property of gravity. Kinda like how doubling the passage of time effectively doubles the measured heat in a volume, given that heat is a measure of particle interactions per second. Twice the seconds, twice the interactions. If time gets fucky when two particals get close enough to interact, that could result in an illusionary force that emerges macroscopically as gravity.

This is all me fucking around but i think theres maybe a nugget of legit speculation in there

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I understood some of these words

yeah, "can", "the", "and", this makes sense

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

That's quiter talk!