this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
295 points (90.0% liked)

memes

17730 readers
1490 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know how relevant this is now, but here's a link to another post where I expressed my thoughts on what kind of pitfalls you might most likely face -- https://lemmy.world/post/36867409

By the way, what is this phenomenon on Lemmy? Let's say people are reluctant to read and comment on old posts published just a couple of days or a week ago, but with new ones, it's a completely different story. What kind of psychology is this? Or it seemed to me?

(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

What you described in your other post is slavery masked as UBI. It's like how Trump's right wing talk about "freedom" when what they actually mean is nothing like the freedom people actually want or imagine.

Salaried work is effectively gilded slavery. Unless you've got ahitloads of capital, money is basically already limiting you to a certain bracket of "freedom" that we call your "means", and it's under the duress of poverty and death. The rules, particularly laws, apply a lot more strongly to those who are poor than who are rich. Interest punishes poorer borrowers and rewards those who can barrow with impunity by giving them access to endless credit.

A true UBI is essentially unconditional access to the bare necessities of life. Food, shelter, healthcare, security, and public utilities. Doesn't matter if you never work a day in your life - you are valued because you exist. It should grant those who do not want to work a means to live with dignity, and those who do want to work a secure launch pad for finding a vocation that is right for them.

The claims this would lead to lack of incentives to work is misleading. The psychological reality is well l-raised mentally healthy people who are valued as members of a community wish to serve that community however they can, and don't want to feel like "free loaders". They want to be seen to be contributing and making a difference. Not to be thought of as lazy or useless. We're social creatures and we have an instinct for living in a society. It's why we're here now after hundreds of thousands of years.

But, would we want to do dangerous, dirty, unfulfilling and undignified work, for shitty pay? Who will sign up to clean toilets, sweep roads, carry worksite debris to the skip, stand behind the till at the gas station or convenience store 8+ hours a day, answer hundreds of phone calls a day just to give people information they can find online? Obviously, where we can't automate, or otherwise relieve people of the need to do this kind of work, and many hands will not make light work of the situation (e.g. instead of having janitors let's some percentage of the office staff clean up during the last hour of the day, like how we take turns doing the dishes at home), and we actually need sufficient people doing this kind of work full tim, then clearly these jobs need to have rewards sufficient to have people sign up to them. There won't be a need for as many as their are nowz and those who do sign up will be more efficient for the fact they're there of their own Accord and can quit any time they want.

It will be a real challenge to transition to this kind of incentive structure under the current incentives of capitalism (not to many how fucked up it makes people's mental health and moral sentiment towards "the other" as competitors rather than collaborators), and ultimately monetary economics will probably need a significant overhaul and it may not even necessary in the long run. There may be better ways to distribute resources that still has mechanisms for rewarding hard work and determination, unique talent or passion, risk taking, etc. to a degree that nobody will resent such people for their success.

But the way I see it, this is what progress looks like. It's working toward this kind of world that should drive our social and political engagements. I want you to be free - truly free - to life your best life. And not so that your doing means others have to be enslaved. That should make you miserable at every moment.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't trust UBI because I don't trust the average person to manage their free time and money carefully. This just feels like a road to boredom, followed by doing stupid shit, including drugs.

Anyone who have taken a month+ old vacation probably knows what I'm talking about. There comes a point where you just (unintentionally) start degrading yourself because there is no purpose in your life, whether by playing videogames all day or substance abuse

It's even worse when you realize most homeless have psychological or physical problems that made them homeless in the first place, and throwing money at them is likely not going to extend their lives if you know what I meant, or fix said problems.

[–] GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except studies consistently show UBI counterintuitively incentivizes those on it to work: 'Finland is the only country to have carried out a nationwide, randomised control trial of UBI. The evaluation found that people receiving basic income were more likely to be in work than those in the control group.'

Also, having a secure financial footing is remarkably effective at alleviating mental health issues and promoting overall wellbeing, leading to more people in the workforce and more people contributing to the economy (ideally, this would benefit everyone but, you know, Neoliberalism...).

Bit of a knee jerk reaction, my man.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Finland. Lol. I live next to it, you gotta understand that the people have a vastly different mindset than in many other places. Hence it being the happiest country on earth. You also gotta understand that people who are using lemmy are likely not the risk people, but everyone loves to base reality on their own subjectivity.

Repeat the same experiment in some poorer US state.

[–] GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So your take is: let's throw all those other studies from other countries in the bin then, because it clearly just comes down to 'mindset'. Wat

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, but when drug abuse is not a problem in the first place, UBI should not make it a thing. Use your common sense. I'm talking about places where you see entire sidewalks stretching miles long with drug addicts. Do you honestly believe giving them money will make them go "oh, drugs bad, maybe I should work".. wat indeed.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 week ago (25 children)

UBI is a bad idea because it reinforces and relies on the capitalist idea of money. We should make basic resources themselves free, like a supermarket you can walk into and take stuff without paying, rather than giving people points to buy stuff that costs points.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›