1263
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Amilo159@lemmy.world to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world

Why YSK: because what seems like equal situation from surface isn't always equal opportunity for all. And even when equal measure of help is provided, it might not be equally useful.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] smeg@feddit.uk 188 points 1 year ago

Every time I see this quaint but misleading image reposted it's necessary to make the same comment: the words attached to each image are do not exclusively represent those images. "Equality" could apply to all but the first; nobody uses "equity" this way; and most people use "justice" to refer to criminal justice and punishment.

[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

Plenty of people use equity this way. Maybe not in your circles, but it’s not a new definition, it’s been around for decades. Millions of people in the US alone do not equate the criminal Justice system with the concept of Justice. Perhaps you should recognize that your perceptions are not able to be applied to the entire population. If you ever find yourself using “nobody” or “everybody” and you have no definitive data backing that up, I would recommend re-examining your biases, because what you appear to be doing is attempting to normalize your beliefs while otherizing the beliefs of others who do not share your view.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Elivey@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago

I guess that meme I keep seeing that's asks "did we leave all the stupid people on reddit?" Was wrong.

Y'all can't understand a few simple metaphorical images that looks like it was designed for children to understand, and are going all out in contriving obtuse reasons for why it doesn't work or isn't realistic.

Yes, of course if this was real she could walk to the other side, but it's a fucking metaphor.

[-] neutron@thelemmy.club 26 points 1 year ago

Arguing about the metaphors and analogies instead of actual topics? Saw plenty of those during college, especially when the guy in question was being a contrarian just to 'stick it to the man' and look cool to their buddies.

I thought working adults would grow out of it - nah, we're all dumb children inside, including me.

[-] KaleDaddy@reddthat.com 19 points 1 year ago

I see it all the time. A certain demographic seemingly cannot comprehend metaphors and jf it isnt literally perfect in every way they attack it. I think really they know they wont look good admitting they have issues with the message of equality/equity so they attack the method of delivery instead

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SoNick@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago

I like the boxes and fence one more, this just feels super-contrived

[-] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

But that one always brings out the smug responses about how they shouldn't be watching the game for free, totally (and purposefully) missing the point

[-] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

The girl could literally just walk to the other side of the tree, there's no actual barrier. This one is super ham-fisted because it can spark the wrong side of the debate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Decoy321@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago

True justice would be them watering the tree or something. That dude has been giving to these little shits the whole time. Let it be The Getting Tree for once.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Oyster_Lust@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Equality should be in protection of rights. People are not equal, and never will be. They should have equal rights, though.

Steve Vai is a better guitarist than I am. He shouldn't have his fingers broken so that we both have equal ability to play the guitar.

Trying to make people equal in every way is evil. It only brings the best in every field down to the level of the worst, since there's no way to bring everyone up to the level of the best in every field.

[-] ImGonnaTryScience@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

That's not the point of equity. The point is to compensate for disadvantages people couldn't prevent and can't fix on their own. Stairs are equal. They work the same way for everyone. But someone in a wheelchair can't climb stairs.

[-] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

But you can reframe it. People don't have equal mobility but everyone has an equal right to access a place, so you have stairs and ramps. You can't make everything a ramp or stair to create equality.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] hark@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Nobody is advocating for breaking fingers. Following the example set by the image, if someone were to have, for example, issues with their hands, then they should be provided tools to help them play the guitar. Do you think someone with a disability shouldn't be allowed to do things even though tools to let them do those things exist? Keeping up such barriers is how we miss out on amazing talents hampered by obstacles that could be overcome provided adequate access.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I think what he was saying, but slightly missed, was, if both people needed guitar classes, we should not give the guy with the hand issues the only available seat.

Really though, if we just spend a bit more on education, there could be seats for everyone! So maybe the last picture could be fertilizing the tree to make it bigger or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] June@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

This image isn’t about making people equal, it’s about making systems equal…

[-] JustAThought@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I think your problem is that you think that something will be taken away. Try to think in terms of the giving. Steve is not going to have anything taken away. Someone will have access to guitars that wouldn’t otherwise. Steve will be fine.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] thereisalamp@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You entirely missed the point of this picture.

This picture isn't about breaking Steve's fingers so you can both play shitty guitar. It's about making sure you can both access a guitar and lessons to learn.

The equality picture would be shoving a guitar in each of your hands and a coupon for lessons, while failing to address that you live 2 hours away from the teacher while he lives next door.

Eta: equity would be providing you with a free buss ride to the teachers house 2 hours away. This gives you all the tools to get guitar lessons, but, you might not be able to take advantage of this because a 5 hour commitment isn't the same as a 1 hour 5 minute commitment and you lose out on opportunity cost. You get free guitar lessons and a ride, but the system is broken. Justice is fixing the system so that there's enough guitar teachers within a reasonable distance. Like say, making sure that no one is more than 20 minutes from a guitar teacher.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

You'll notice the Steve Vai apple picker (left) never has a reduction in apple access.

Your suggestion some harm might come to Steve Vai doesn't make sense, he can access apples as well as ever

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I posted this to a comment further down, but thought I should post it up here:

At birth there are situations that give people advantages that have nothing to do with ability. These advantages are systemic, where certain people will have better access to opportunity (apples) than others. The goal should be that the opportunities are equal so no one has a head start. The best apple picker will pick more apples instead of the person born with an orchard and apple picking machinery who very well may be a shit apple picker.

For your example, we'd end up with the best musicians becoming popular, not the ones where their parent could afford to give them private lessons since childhood and had industry connections to make them big where they wouldn't otherwise.

It's not about equality of outcomes, it's about equality of opportunity. No one should start a race with a head start because then you don't know who the best runner is. Everyone should start equally and everyone should have equal access to the same shoes, equipment, and practice opportunity, otherwise we can't see who's actually best without an advantage.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] olpappy@mander.xyz 40 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mex@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 year ago

Equality is letting anyone gather apples on any side of the tree.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 5in1k@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago

Putting supports on trees weakens them. The swaying makes them stronger.

load more comments (32 replies)
[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 23 points 1 year ago

OSHA gonna have a word about how they’re using those ladders…

[-] Gxost@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

The Justice pic: a man yells at the kids stealing apples from his garden, while the kids are running away, loosing all the apples.

[-] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 16 points 1 year ago

I remember this type of post being 90% of r/coolguides

[-] toastus@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

Doesn't the first panel also have equal tools and assistance?

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 14 points 1 year ago

No. The system leaning in favor of one group is very much a type of assistance.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] Amilo159@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

No since the tree is leaning to one side, so more apples will fall that way.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] nxfsi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Capitalism: hire an apple picking expert to pick the apples and sell them at exorbitant prices because there is a monopoly on apples.

Communism: send the apple picking expert to work in the steel factory and get a random university professor to pick them instead

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Feudalism: A lord owns the land and the trees growing in it. He has a bunch of peasants who will pick the apples for him. The lord gets all the apples and the peasants are allowed to live on his lands another day. Later that night, they go work on their own farms that hopefully give them enough food to keep going. In the long term they’ll probably starve to death or get kicked out of the house they themselves built. I guess living as s hunter-gatherer in the forest isn’t that bad compared to the other alternatives.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)

We could also just shoot the kulak on the left and take back the apples she stole from the people's tree

[-] Widowmaker_Best_Girl@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the communist solution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

unfortunately the apple tree is the proletariat

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
1263 points (88.7% liked)

You Should Know

33397 readers
1148 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS