194
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Rudy Giuliani has been ordered to pay nearly $150 million in damages to former Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, whom he defamed following the 2020 presidential election.

But as with all major jury awards, the question is whether Freeman and Moss will see any of that money.

Giuliani, the former New York mayor and onetime attorney to former President Donald Trump, has vowed to appeal the jury’s verdict. During the trial, he and his attorneys repeatedly said that he already doesn’t have funds to cover his various debts, but it’s unclear how much the former New York mayor actually has.

Attorneys for Freeman and Moss said in court they had tried to find out Giuliani’s net worth, but because he hadn’t responded to many of their subpoenas in the lawsuit, they couldn’t determine a figure.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 44 points 11 months ago

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/29/realestate/rudy-giuliani-apartment-sale-nyc.html

Giuliani's NYC apartment is up for sale. They should get that piece of property immediately.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

it's quite possible there are loans against that and other properties he may have, and lenders get paid first.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

Put him to work selling handies behind the dumpster at Four Seasons Total Landscaping.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

There is a porn shop next door. They probably have a glory hole.

[-] zacharoid@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

I want to watch him cry though

[-] ares35@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

just be careful not to get anything on you.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

How does one just ignore a subpoena from a judge in a case like this? If I did this I would be held in contempt and locked up until I agreed to comply, wouldn't I?

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

This was a civil case. His failure to appear previously cost him $230,000 in fines which go to the plaintiffs, iirc. He likely figured that he was going to lose a massive judgement anyway, so paying 230k (if he pays it) is a small price to avoid discovery that could open the door to other lawsuits.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 32 points 11 months ago

They won't see all of it but they'll get something. It'll get reduced in appeal and then he'll declare bankruptcy and it'll get reduced more and put in a payment plan but I can't see a bankruptcy judge letting him off from this entirely.

Still plenty for a normal person to receive $300k/yr or something.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

If we learned anything from the Alex Jones case, it's that bankruptcy will not protect you.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Does he even have any money? I thought he was near bankruptcy two years ago when he was begging Trump for money.

[-] Affidavit@aussie.zone 30 points 11 months ago

'Bankruptcy' means an inability to pay your debts. Can he pay $1.5b? Probably not, but does he have money? Yes, he does. He is a multi-millionaire owning at least 5 properties and spends tens of thousands each month on his 'expenses'.

Don't confuse bankruptcy with poverty.

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah ‘broke’ means different things to people like that. It just means their 3rd homes might need to be rented out for a while, not that they are in danger of missing a meal or 10.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

They'll get all he has left and this is before the Smartmatic and Dominion lawsuits.

[-] autotldr 5 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Attorneys for Freeman and Moss said in court they had tried to find out Giuliani’s net worth, but because he hadn’t responded to many of their subpoenas in the lawsuit, they couldn’t determine a figure.

Ryan Goodman, a former special counsel at the Department of Defense, told Burnett that it’s likely the election workers will collect only “a fraction” of the awarded amount.

He also owed more than $1 million to defense attorneys who’ve helped him on other matters, prompting them to sue him this year, and hadn’t paid nearly $60,000 for years-old phone bills.

Yet at times he’s had help – including from Trump – to try to fundraise to offset some of his debts, and he was able to take a private plane to his arrest on criminal charges related to 2020 election interference in Georgia this summer.

That issue, according to people familiar with the case, may have to be decided by the courts at a later time, and it’s possible he could still be on the hook for what the jury awards Moss and Freeman, even if he goes into bankruptcy.

In a different high-profile defamation case against far-right personality Alex Jones brought by the families of Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims, the courts have had to look at this type of issue.


The original article contains 881 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

You know the rule. When an article asks a question…..

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
194 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2852 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS