18
Ok, not so bad. There was work being done on trees that were thought to be Darling 58, but were actually Darling 54. So maybe that work will have to be redone on Darling 58 trees?
My understanding is that there were enough mistakes like that for the project funding to be cut
Yeah, and funding dictates the pace of work.
Was the funding cut? The ACF has stopped backing the project, but I think that was a political and organizational backing, not necessarily financial.
I still believe this project will form the basis of the resurrection of this species, although it’s concerning that this wasn’t caught earlier. But we can see the defective version as a prototype—now that we understand the problem, it should not be too difficult to correct. However it may take further years to fully establish the safety of the new version.
this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
18 points (87.5% liked)
Tree Huggers
598 readers
1 users here now
A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS