Not necessarily. All DRM punishes paying customers, but some also punishes pirates. Very few games with Denuvo ever get cracked, instead the publisher removes it after a while because Denuvo charges a license fee as long as its in your game. E.g. the Hatsune Miku game on steam hasn't been cracked in the two years it's been out. So there's an argument for using it, even if it's a flawed one.

But these games already went without DRM for years. They're long since cracked. The only purpose this DRM serves is to make it harder for paying customers to use mods. Not pirates, they can keep using the same mods they've always used. This is literally for the purpose of degrading the experience of paying customers. That's what they mean by "only punishes paying customers".

It's pretty frustrating that I had to buy a different version of fallout 4 to use serious mods, just because the Xbox app adds an extra layer of DRM.

It's an long-term decision meant to kill modding. Having to seek a cracked version for modding isn't a problem for some users, but it's an imposing thing for users on average. It makes it less likely that your average user will attempt to engage with mods, which reduces the audience for mods, and that in turn makes mod developers less likely to develop them.

It's about strangling the life out of modding communities slowly.

But they don't promote linux platform.

GOG lost my trust with the Hitman situation, and lashing out at customers that were leaving reviews detailing the situation.

https://www.eurogamer.net/hitman-gog-release-sparks-drm-row-review-bombing-accusation

They also sneakily updated the page to mention the DRM after people had bought the game.

More like digital wrongs management.

When you say MWH, did you mean MHW, as in Monster Hunter World? I can't think of another Capcom game that MHW could be.

I feel you, I can't play unmodded skyrim because the quests and plots are so paper thin I just lose interest after a few hours, but it's a great sandbox for modders to play around in and I'm enjoying my run as a monk with an entire unarmed perk tree.

I have issues with Ubisoft even if they make shitty games I don't play. (I've played older titles but have since quit supporting or playing the ones I have), since the company is still preying on whales, children and gamers who are less savvy about dark patterns. Ubisoft also still continues a toxic work environment in which the upper management preys sexually on the clerical staff and then works to bury any scandals and silence the victims. And I'd regard that as offensive and bad for the economy even if it was happening in a fissile fuel rod manufacturing company I never personally engaged with.

Ubisoft, and much of the gaming industry generally is really awful across several compound practices. I mean EA and Gearbox have the same kinds of developer abuse climate and they routinely crunch and do massive layoffs even though both practices make their games measurably worse.

That said, Capcom has been a problem for a long time, and I've ceased getting or playing capcom games over a decade ago. But I hope it tanks and stops taking money from gamers who don't know better.

That article feels autogenerated, it repeats the same four lines over and over. Basically one guy says that thousands of other people are wrong.