833
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

A soft drink cabal dedicated to making sure we can still put poison in consumables.

The world just keeps getting weirder.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Fine. It still tastes nasty.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
833 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32282 readers
691 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS