this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
357 points (94.7% liked)

The memes of the climate

2104 readers
1 users here now

The climate of the memes of the climate!

Planet is on fire!

mod notice: do not hesitate to report abusive comments, I am not always here.

rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kapulsa@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Being mindful of ones own actions is good, but saving the planet needs us to target big oil.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/aug/23/big-oil-coined-carbon-footprints-to-blame-us-for-their-greed-keep-them-on-the-hook

Posting and liking memes is great, but real change comes from actions. If you are as concerned as we are about climate change, please consider joining or supporting climate activists near you.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the link. It’s important for everyone to read, especially those who don’t understand why “carbon footprint” has recently become a joke on Lemmy.

[–] TakiMinase@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, target big oil, not poor people trying to get to work.

[–] pizzazz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Using big oil's cheap goods?

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

What does big oil do exactly?

They burn this oil they dig out of the ground and cause fossil fuels?

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Citizen, I can assure you that climate change is completely your fault for leaving the bathroom light on the other day. Now, if you'll excuse me I have a mountain to frack."

[–] pizzazz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah because they do fracking to simply burn fossil fuels because they're bad bad evil ppl. Not because there's like, a huge demand for them.

[–] Arcity@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a demand because they lobby away investment in alternatives.

[–] pizzazz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not denying that. But "big oil" provides for personal needs. It's not like private consumption and hydrocarbon extraction are two completely separate concepts. One exists to feed the other. If we really want to do something about this clusterfuck we need to be ready to change our personal consumption patterns; total depersonalization of responsibility is ridiculous and naive.

[–] Arcity@feddit.nl -1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, buy less advocado toast and buy an electric car that is almost as poluting with our current production and infrastructure. No you can't out buy the oil industry. If we are talking meat consumption than less we do have more say in scaling it back.

[–] Jakra@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Just wait till I tell you about plastic recycling!

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's not propaganda per se. It's a reminder of how much you're their bitch.

[–] Pizza_Rat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] pizzazz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I might agree but keep in mind that all consumer goods and even food will become way more unaffordable. Our economy is based on emissions because it's cheap and kinda convenient for everyone, not because we're that hellbent on destroying the earth.

[–] Pizza_Rat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed! That convenience is called a negative externally. It is a cost that accumulates to everyone that is not captured in the manufacturing process. Implementing a carbon tax (which can start small, and increment predictably over a period of years) would re-align purchasing decisions to true costs.

All change is hard, but it is the best solution because it appropriately distributes costs with minimal complexity and no loopholes. And it sure beats doing nothing IMHO.

This is why we should be mad at the company that manufactures Taylor Swift’s private jet and not her.