this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
175 points (95.8% liked)

Linux

58282 readers
607 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Which one(s) and why?

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wgs@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago

Crux. Simplest package building system out there, and the core is just out of the way completely, giving you the keys to setup your system just the way you want it.

[–] mfat@lemdro.id 2 points 2 years ago
[–] brunofin@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Windows, then Ubuntu when I started Computer Science, then Linux Mint, and I've been hopping back and forth between both but mostly Mint, then for a while also KDE Neon, then I decided to leave my comfort zone and tried Fedora, and never looked back.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

Arch Linux (Endeavour OS if you are scared of the terminal) for personal use. It's almost all the software you want one click away, plus the best documentation ever.

Debian on my company's computer because Debian.

[–] Maturi0n@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

SUSE -> Mageia -> Ubuntu -> Manjaro -> Mint -> Manjaro. Been on Manjaro for 4 years now.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I tried a ton, and I settled with Fedora just for the mix of stability and support. Though, with Red Hat being asses I might have to mix it up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thragtacular@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Nowhere. I install whatever will actually get through the installation process without fucking itself up on the hardware that I'm using.

MOST of the time that ends up being Mint because the developers aren't idiots. SOMETIMES it's Ubuntu. But neither wants to install properly every time, because of course not.

[–] sibloure@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Fedora Silverblue. Solid like Debian but doesn't break and require reinstall when I tinker around.

[–] realz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I tried Fedora, Centos, Ubuntu, Debian, Slackware, Gentoo, and Mint. Finally settled on Arch Linux about 15 years ago. Never looked back.

[–] Junkdata@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Windows -> macos -> pop os -> debian -> fedora ↓ Now

  • linux mint(desktop)
  • slackware(laptop)
  • arch linux(Kvm/Qemu for gaming)
  • Netbsd(older hardware/for fun)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] feef@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Opensuse tw

[–] max641@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Keep distrohopping. I think I cannot settle.

[–] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

started with ubuntu in 2008, moved to debian a few months into it. Tried other distros at other times, but the stability of debian keeps me coming back to it. Plus I like the fact it's a community distro

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

After years of stable distros and dealing with outdated software, and years of arch and dealing with updates causing me to fail to boot, I've recently hopped through every popular distro and landed on MX+Nix.

It solves both of my problems. The system is rock solid thanks to Debian, and I still get bleeding edge userland packages from nix unstable.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›