First that research paper, now this. Maybe we should start charging for... I don't know what exactly. But we should start charging someone something.
GenZedong
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
$60 million a year to train an AI on our data.
That AI would prolly be based af. Might be an asshole from the trolling we do for the "venting".... I'm thinking of a teenager with class consciousness, marx with acne and memes or some such.
whoever uses 'tankies' unironically i want to strangle you and leave your corpse in the snow
Where 'toxic' is not being in lockstep with State department narrative.
Do they explain voat being so toxic that no one would advertise on it for any amount of money? And you know those freeze peach idiots aren't going to chip in on any of the costs, and then it became too expensive, in like a year, for the guy to keep paying for it while living in mom's basement