111
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mr_right@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

wow just wow while i can't say i didn't see this one coming but it always amazes me where greed could lead someone

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cccc@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Peertube, Nebula, Patreon, etc. You don’t have to use YouTube.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Not the main point, but this is the first time I've seen "allowlisted". Lol

...are they trying to avoid saying whitelisted because of the word "white"?

[-] OneDimensionPrinter@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, at my company we switched to allow/block listed last year. Whitelisted and blacklisted are verboten

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

A lot of companies seem to be doing this, personally I think trying to make a connection between race and tech is a bit far fetched. Nobody thinks of race when talking about whitelists and blacklists...

In public repos where these changes are merged in to FOSS projects, they get little resistance too - although I could see concern of a potential backlash if anyone questioned the alleged benefit of such a change.

Imagine if this approach was taken with the (now outdated) IDE interface? Instead of "Primary Master, Primary Slave, Secondary Master, Secondary Slave", there'd maybe be "Primary Primary, Primary Secondary, Secondary Primary, Secondary Secondary" 😵‍

[-] mcmxci@mimiclem.me 1 points 1 year ago

Hasn't Kubernetes already replaced master-slave with master/manager-worker? Seems like there are plenty of alternatives.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)

I'm not so sure that this is anything to worry about. It's just another step in the game of cat and mouse. Is it annoying? Of course! But if/when it goes mainstream, ad blockers are just going to push updates that make it possible to block the ad block blocker. uBlock Origin does a really good job at blocking ad block blockers on most sites.

[-] hydra@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

True, especially with the fuckfuckadblock list which really mitigates most aDvLoKC d3TeKteD bullshit.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] LeHappStick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If in the future they make it completely impossible to use ad blockers I'll just stop actively using YouTube. I hope a good enough alternative comes around.

I've heard it is quite difficult to make one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prtm@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To everyone who is saying they use adblock and haven't seen this yet: YouTube probably rolled this out to a smaller percentage of users first. It allows them to understand how this change impacts user behaviour, e.g. how many users comply and disable their adblocker, how many more users close YouTube than usual etc. Most tech companies do this type of analysis before releasing a high impact change to all users.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Revanced: Blocked, huh? You don't say.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GINTegg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Youtube should be archived, burnt to the ground, and replaced

[-] bashfluff@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not paying for YouTube. It's algorithm sucks, it routinely sells your personal data, and virtually none of the money you spend goes to its creators--that YouTube pretends otherwise is repulsive. How did we get in the situation where we're being asked to pay more and more for worse and worse services? I'm not gonna be a part of it.

[-] Fontasia@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

I just don't get how these providers (Specifically Reddit with the API lockdown and now the stranglehold on mods, Twitter's new login requirement, and YouTube now cracking down on adblockers) are missing the point that their sites live and die by user generated content.

I understand these sites are hugely expensive to run, but if you keep alienating those who are bringing users to your site in the first place, people will stop submitting and people will stop visiting.

[-] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well, realistically there is a good chance that this will turn out just fine business-wise. They don't care if they lose some engagement or if the quality goes to shit. It's all good, as long as it makes some money.

In my opinion, this sort of model should be considered anti-competitive. It has become apparent that these services operate on a model where they offer a service that is too good to be true in order to kill the competition, and then they switch to their actual profitable business plan. If you think about it, peertube is a much more sensible economical model with its federation and p2p streaming. But nobody has ever cared about it because huge tech giants offer hosting & bandwith "for free". The evil part of youtube is not the ads, its the fact that it allowed us to bypass them long enough for the entire planet to become dependent on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Still waiting for ISPs to change their model ever since “net neutrality” was abolished. With all of this shit with YouTube, Twitter, and Reddit coming down the pipe it really does feel there has been a global change in how corporations are squeezing their customers. I am guessing ISPs are waiting for the bulk of services to change their model before they sweep in with their greed. It’s coming.

[-] Brad@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

If isp corpos start pulling shit like this, I'm out! I'm going to get a library membership & be done with the internet for good.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
111 points (96.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54627 readers
466 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS