this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
32 points (79.6% liked)

PC Gaming

11623 readers
281 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

2 video banner ads and 5 scrolling ads so I can read screenshotted comments made on a different platform.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, you weren't kidding. That was intrusive.

[–] alessandro@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why don't use an adblock? (Origin/adnuseam etc)

You can set in blacklist mode and block only website that over promote if is an ethical issue

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah kotaku is a nightmare.

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love how all of those reviews are from people who have 0 hours in the last 2 weeks, and less than 100 hours of playtime.

It doesn't seem like it has a long shelf life.

[–] alessandro@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We're so used to GaaS that enforce grinding and manipulative fomo/daily rewards to the to point a videogame must be shit if people just had fun with it

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If this game has more of a linear storyline and people are simply completing it, then the playtime as an issue. Portal is a great game, and you likely won't spend 100 hours in it.

It looked like it was an open-world explore/build game, which normally means a long playtime of self-directed goals. If you can't keep your players engaged for 100+ hours in those types of games, then the world or the mechanics aren't engaging.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

100 hours is a major investment. For me a game was worth it if I spent less than 1$/hour.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have not, meme marketing doesn't interest me.

I hope those that bought it enjoyed the game

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I enjoyed it a lot, I just don't have time to commit to these games with self driven goals anymore unfortunately.

Then Helldivers came out and with its ability to drop in and play for an hour have a good time then evaluate if you want to get off its far better for me.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Then why even pontificate about hours played and their relationship to content? I have 150 hours and still have not completed everything.