612
submitted 3 months ago by Sibbo@sopuli.xyz to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Those who know, know.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

I generally agree, but there are some things that are oversimplified. Sure a point(x, y) can have public attributes, but usually business objects are a bit more complex: insurancePolicy, deliveryRoute, user, etc. Having some control over those is definitely something you want to implement, at the cost of some boilerplate.

[-] shy_mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh for sure. I have nothing against getters and setters when they're justified, but in the case of bare fields with no validation like that example it's just annoying.
Also stuff like this just grinds my gears (oversimplified example again):

class IntegerAdder {
    private int a, b;
    public IntegerAdder(int a, int b) {
        this.a = a;
        this.b = b;
    }
    
    public int get_sum() {
        return a + b;
    }
}

Just make it a bloody function.
You may say it's silly, but I've genuinely found code like this in the wild. Not that exact code snippet of course but that was the spirit.

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
612 points (97.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32396 readers
684 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS